WO1997034210A1 - Controllable reactor with feedback control winding - Google Patents

Controllable reactor with feedback control winding Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997034210A1
WO1997034210A1 PCT/SE1997/000424 SE9700424W WO9734210A1 WO 1997034210 A1 WO1997034210 A1 WO 1997034210A1 SE 9700424 W SE9700424 W SE 9700424W WO 9734210 A1 WO9734210 A1 WO 9734210A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
control
voltage
current
winding
load
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE1997/000424
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sven HÖRNFELDT
Original Assignee
Abb Research Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Abb Research Ltd. filed Critical Abb Research Ltd.
Publication of WO1997034210A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997034210A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/12Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is ac
    • G05F1/32Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is ac using magnetic devices having a controllable degree of saturation as final control devices
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H9/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements for limiting excess current or voltage without disconnection
    • H02H9/02Emergency protective circuit arrangements for limiting excess current or voltage without disconnection responsive to excess current
    • H02H9/021Current limitation using saturable reactors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device comprising a controllable reactor by means of which the voltage, phase, current, harmonic content, etc., of an ac network may be influenced.
  • the controllable reactor comprises a power winding and a control winding which surround the same magnetic flux.
  • the device also.comprises a control and supply circuit for the control winding.
  • Voltage control The voltage is to be adjustable upwards or downwards, or the voltage is to be kept constant during varying loads;
  • the current is to be limited when exceeding a predetermined value
  • Harmonic filtering Currents with a frequency different from the fundamental of the alternating voltage, also current pulses, are to be damped.
  • the rotary transformer which serves as a simple, robust and practically stepless voltage control for low voltage, is no alternative for voltage control of power transformers.
  • a voltage control is achieved with on-load tap changers which make it possible to choose between a number of terminals of the control winding of the trans ⁇ former.
  • On-load tap changers are mechanically complicated designs and cause a large part of the transformer breakdowns.
  • Harmonic filtering may be performed with permanently installed filter circuits, or with stepwise connection or disconnection of filter elements in the same way as described above for power factor correction. Also active filtering with feedback and use of power electronics occurs within some special fields of use.
  • Current limiting is carried out either by directly breaking the current, for example with a circuit breaker, or by placing a device in the circuit, which functions as a variable impe- dance, for example an inductance which may be changed by changed premagnetization of the core.
  • a device solves the problem of carrying out, in a stepless manner, voltage control, power factor correction, harmonic filtering and current limiting using one and the same piece of equipment.
  • a device according to the invention will normally be used in connection with a network, the line voltage Uo of which is to be supplemented with a control voltage ⁇ U before it reaches to a load which places high demands on the feeding voltage, referred to below as load voltage U.
  • the load is a network comprising a number of load objects.
  • a device For each phase of the network, a device according to the invention comprises at least one control winding and at least one power winding with a common magnetic flux ⁇ which is measured with a transducer, preferably a measuring coil surrounding the same magnetic flux.
  • the current In through the power winding and the load referred to below as a load current
  • the line voltage Uo, the load voltage U and the voltage across the power winding which constitutes the above- mentioned control voltage ⁇ U are measured with the aid of suitable measuring means and are supplied to a control unit together with a signal corresponding to the magnetic flux, for example the voltage of the measuring coil, referred to below as the flux voltage V ⁇ .
  • the control unit controls a power amplifier which supplies the control winding with a control current I s .
  • the relationship between the measured values Io, ⁇ U, Uo, U, V ⁇ and the control current is determined by the desired function of the device.
  • control winding may instead be sectioned with one power amplifier for each section and a common control unit for all the power amplifiers be used.
  • the power amplifier delivers a control current which gives rise to a control voltage +/- ⁇ U in the power winding, depending on whether the load voltage is to be increased or decreased.
  • a control voltage ⁇ U is instead achieved which is phase-shifted by +/- ⁇ /2 in relation to the line voltage Uo ⁇
  • a combination of power factor correc ⁇ tion and voltage control means an arbitrary phase angle of the control voltage ⁇ U which can also be expressed as a complex voltage which is added to the line voltage Uo-
  • a control current I s is fed to the control winding which, for a load current Io through the power winding which falls below a predetermined maximum value, results in the magnetic flux ⁇ disappearing.
  • control voltage ⁇ U across the power winding is reduced to the normally negligible resistive voltage drop.
  • This is equivalent to a transformer with a short-circuited superconducting secondary coil which becomes traversed by the secondary current which causes the magnetic flux to disappear.
  • This method is used in the patent 94/01470-1 SE for active damping of magnetic fields. If the load current Io exceeds the maximum value, the control current is no longer increased in a corresponding way but is maintained at a value corresponding to the maximum value. This means that the magnetic flux ⁇ becomes different from zero.
  • a device accor- ding to the invention functions as a reactor which limits this current by achieving an inductive voltage drop across the power winding.
  • the device functions as a current-limiting reactor with a considerable inductance.
  • the control winding is fed with a control current which only contains the fundamental of the line voltage with a current intensity which is so adapted that the fundamental component of the magnetic flux disappears.
  • the load current through the power winding then only "sees" one, in practice negligible, resistive load for the fundamental, but an inductive load for all the harmonics and also other disturbances, for example current pulses.
  • a device according to the invention is thus made to function as a bandpass filter with the fundamental frequency as the centre frequency.
  • the control unit may also be caused to give a con- trol current in opposition to current components through the power winding which do not belong to the fundamental; the device then functions as an active filter.
  • the invention may be regarded as an improvement of a so-called booster transformer, where the galvanic coupling between a winding of an excitation transformer and a winding of a series transformer, which only permits voltage control, is replaced by the control unit and the power amplifier. In this way, the plurality of control functions already described may be achieved.
  • Figure 1 shows a device according to the invention, connected to a network in the form of a power transformer and a load.
  • Figure 2 shows the relationship between uncorrected and corrected voltage in a vector diagram.
  • Figure 3 shows a non-sinusoidal line voltage, the control voltage of the device and a load voltage after filtering.
  • Figures 4a and 4b show schematically combinations of an on ⁇ load tap changer with one or more devices according to the invention.
  • Figure 1 shows a device according to the invention, which is connected between a network in the form of a power transformer 1 and a load 2, symbolized by a resistor.
  • the load 2 may consist of a network comprising a plurality of consumers.
  • the power transformer has a primary winding 3 and a secondary winding 4.
  • the voltage of the secondary winding corresponds to the above-mentioned line voltage Uo.
  • the device comprises an iron core 6 with a power winding 5, a control winding 7 and a measuring winding 8 for deter ⁇ mining the magnetic flux ⁇ in the iron core.
  • the power winding is connected in series with the secondary winding and the load, and a load current Io flows in the circuit.
  • the control winding is fed from a power amplifier 9 which is controlled from a control unit 10.
  • the power amplifier and the control unit are fed with current from a current supply device 11, which in turn is fed from an auxiliary winding 12 of the power transformer 1.
  • a current supply device 11 which in turn is fed from an auxiliary winding 12 of the power transformer 1.
  • the line voltage Uo, the load voltage U, the load current Io and the voltage V ⁇ across the measuring winding which is proportional to a magnetic flux ⁇ common to the power winding and the control winding, are fed back to the control unit.
  • the combinations ⁇ U and Uo or ⁇ U and U may be supplied to the control unit instead of the combination U and UQ, depending on which combination of measurements is simplest to achieve. In that case, it is also necessary for ⁇ U to be measured; this is indicated in dashed lines in Figure 1.
  • the control unit is to be programmed such that, on the basis of the feedback signals and otherwise well-known relationships between these, it achieves, via the power amplifier, the control current I s to the control winding which is needed for the control voltage ⁇ U to become the proper supplementation of the line voltage Uo for the application in question.
  • the application may be voltage control of the load voltage U at varying line voltage and/or load, power factor correction, current limiting, filtering, etc., or some combination thereof.
  • the control voltage corresponds to the amplitude of that control error which is obtained on a comparison between the desired amplitude
  • the relationship between the flux ⁇ for a given ⁇ U and the relationship between the flux ⁇ and the control current I s may be determined.
  • the control unit via the power amplifier, may generate that control current I s which gives a flux propor ⁇ tional to ⁇ U, in phase with or in opposition to the line voltage Uo, in the power winding.
  • the control unit can generate the required control current via the power amplifier in the same way as described above.
  • a frequently occurring control case is that the load voltage U has to be controlled both in amplitude and in phase relative to a line voltage Uo •
  • the task thus comprises, according to Figure 2, determining the ⁇ U, both from the amplitude and the phase point of view, which is needed for the vectorial sum of Uo and ⁇ U to correspond to the desired load voltage U. If the desired load voltage U is phase-shifted by an angle ⁇ relative to the line voltage Uo, the amplitude of ⁇ U is determined according to
  • phase shift ⁇ between ⁇ U and Uo is determined from
  • control unit may generate the required control voltage via the power amplifier, in the same way as described above.
  • a device When a device according to the invention is to function as a current limiter, it is a precondition that, at a load current I ⁇ less than an allowed maximum current I ⁇ ma ⁇ / it shall have as small an influence on the circuit as possible.
  • the control unit is therefore adapted such that, at a load current less than the maximum current, it generates and adapts such a control current I s that the resultant flux from the control winding and the power winding is zero.
  • the control voltage ⁇ U across the power winding will consist of the normally negli- gible resistive voltage drop caused by the relevant load current and the resistance of the power winding.
  • the control unit is adapted to maintain the maximum control current Ismax- Because the load current becomes greater than I ⁇ ma ⁇ / during the transition stage the flux will become different from zero which means that the circuit will have a limited addition of inductance.
  • the device By redu ⁇ cing the control current to zero after the transition stage, which may amount to some twenty or thirty milliseconds, the device will function as a current limiting reactor with a considerable inductance.
  • the reduction of the control current may take place immediately after the load current tends to exceed the maximum current, that is, the above-mentioned transition process is excluded.
  • Figure 3a shows a non-sinusoidal line voltage Uo as a function of time t.
  • the control unit is arranged with a Fourier filter which produces the sinusoidal fundamental component of the line voltage and forms that control voltage ⁇ U, shown in Figure 3b, which corresponds to the difference between the relevant line voltage and its sinusoidal fundamental compo ⁇ nent.
  • control current I s may be generated which, via the power amplifier, gives a flux in the power winding proportional to ⁇ U.
  • control voltage ⁇ U is to correspond to the fundamental component and the amplitude of the line voltage, which may both be extracted from the above- mentioned Fourier filter.
  • control current I s may be generated which, via the power amplifier, gives a flux in the power winding propor ⁇ tional to ⁇ U.
  • Figure 4a and Figure 4b show schematically how at least one device according to the invention may be used for stepless voltage control together with an on-load tap changer of a power transformer or a reactor.
  • the terminals of an on-load tap changer are symbolized by the rings 13.
  • the voltage step between two terminals is ⁇ u.
  • one of the devices is replaced by a direct connec ⁇ tion 17 which is only connected when the device 16 provides the same control voltage ⁇ U as the voltage step ⁇ u between the terminals, such that the point 16 and the upper terminal lie on the same voltage.
  • Contacts may be opened and closed in a voltage-free and hence discharge-free manner
  • the voltage of a power transformer or a reactor may be controlled in a stepless manner
  • the on-load tap changer may be designed with fewer terminals.
  • a device for control of the voltage of the power transformer need only be dimensioned for one voltage step between the terminals.
  • a device according to the invention may be used at the same time for both power factor correction and filtering.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Control Of Electrical Variables (AREA)

Abstract

A device for performing, individually or in combination with each other, the functions of voltage control, power factor correction, current limiting and harmonic filtering at a network, with a line voltage U0 and a load voltage U, with the aid of a control voltage ΔU. The device comprises a controllable reactor comprising at least one control winding (7) and at least one power winding (5) for generating the control voltage ΔU, as well as a control unit (10) which, via at least one power amplifier (9), delivers a control current Is to the control winding. The power winding is connected in series with the load (2) and through it flows a load current I0. A measuring member (8) senses the magnetic flux (Ζ) of the controllable reactor and delivers a flux voltage VΖ proportional thereto. Via measuring members, those signals which correspond to the line voltage U0, the load voltage U, the control voltage ΔU, the load current I0 and the flux voltage VΖ are fed back to the control unit which, in dependence thereon, via the power amplifier(s), delivers such a control current Is to the control winding that the control voltage ΔU induced in the power winding supplements the line voltage U0 such that the relevant functions or function are/is achieved.

Description

Controllable reactor with feedback control winding
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a device comprising a controllable reactor by means of which the voltage, phase, current, harmonic content, etc., of an ac network may be influenced. The controllable reactor comprises a power winding and a control winding which surround the same magnetic flux. The device also.comprises a control and supply circuit for the control winding.
BACKGROUND ART, THE PROBLEM
During transmission of electric energy by means of alternating current, in a plurality of situations a need of correcting the voltage, the phase, the current and the harmonic content arises. Typical examples are:
Voltage control: The voltage is to be adjustable upwards or downwards, or the voltage is to be kept constant during varying loads;
Power factor correction: The phase position between voltage and current is to be changed;
Current limiting: The current is to be limited when exceeding a predetermined value;
Harmonic filtering: Currents with a frequency different from the fundamental of the alternating voltage, also current pulses, are to be damped.
For low voltages and currents this can be easily achieved in many different ways, often with the aid of electronics.
However, technical solutions which function satisfactorily in the low-voltage field can seldom be used directly for voltages and currents which are typical of electric energy trans¬ mission. The amount of energy which is released during a control operation would lead to rapid wear of components included in the equipment, and the locally high electric field strength may lead to electrical breakdown of insulating material. For example, the rotary transformer, which serves as a simple, robust and practically stepless voltage control for low voltage, is no alternative for voltage control of power transformers. In that case, a voltage control is achieved with on-load tap changers which make it possible to choose between a number of terminals of the control winding of the trans¬ former. On-load tap changers are mechanically complicated designs and cause a large part of the transformer breakdowns.
Power factor correction require controllable inductances or capacitances. Also here, the solutions of the low-voltage field, for example rotary variable capacitors as controllable capacitances, cannot be used. What is chosen is instead a step-by-step connection or disconnection of inductances or capacitances with the aid of circuit breakers and/or power electronics. To be able to control with small steps, a large number of connection units, for example circuit breakers, are needed.
Harmonic filtering may be performed with permanently installed filter circuits, or with stepwise connection or disconnection of filter elements in the same way as described above for power factor correction. Also active filtering with feedback and use of power electronics occurs within some special fields of use.
Current limiting is carried out either by directly breaking the current, for example with a circuit breaker, or by placing a device in the circuit, which functions as a variable impe- dance, for example an inductance which may be changed by changed premagnetization of the core.
Although the control cases mentioned above have one common feature, namely, to add to a given current/voltage a correc¬ ting current/voltage, solutions according to the prior art require specifically designed equipment. If only one frequency is considered, it is a question of addition of complex current and voltage values . Power factor correction and voltage con- trol are two special cases of this addition.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A device according to the invention solves the problem of carrying out, in a stepless manner, voltage control, power factor correction, harmonic filtering and current limiting using one and the same piece of equipment. By combining a conventional on-load tap changer with at least one device according to the invention, the problem with arcing arising in the on-load tap changer can be considerably reduced and voltage levels between the positions of the on-load tap changer be chosen continuously.
A device according to the invention will normally be used in connection with a network, the line voltage Uo of which is to be supplemented with a control voltage ΔU before it reaches to a load which places high demands on the feeding voltage, referred to below as load voltage U. Normally, the load is a network comprising a number of load objects. By being able to combine voltage control, power factor correction and harmonic filtering, a device according to the invention may maintain the load voltage with unchanged amplitude, phase shift between voltage and current and harmonic content even if the load contains greatly varying resistive, reactive and non-linear loads. Upon exceeding a fixed maximum current to the load, the device may, in addition, limit this current. For each phase of the network, a device according to the invention comprises at least one control winding and at least one power winding with a common magnetic flux Φ which is measured with a transducer, preferably a measuring coil surrounding the same magnetic flux. The current In through the power winding and the load, referred to below as a load current, the line voltage Uo, the load voltage U and the voltage across the power winding which constitutes the above- mentioned control voltage ΔU are measured with the aid of suitable measuring means and are supplied to a control unit together with a signal corresponding to the magnetic flux, for example the voltage of the measuring coil, referred to below as the flux voltage VΦ. The control unit controls a power amplifier which supplies the control winding with a control current Is. The relationship between the measured values Io, ΔU, Uo, U, VΦ and the control current is determined by the desired function of the device.
Depending on the phase angle of the control voltage ΔU added to the line voltage Uo, power may flow in both directions between the power amplifier and the control winding. Thus, the power source of the power amplifier must be able both to deliver and receive power. If the voltage and/or power values become too large to be handled by a single power amplifier, the control winding may instead be sectioned with one power amplifier for each section and a common control unit for all the power amplifiers be used.
In its function as voltage-control equipment, the power amplifier delivers a control current which gives rise to a control voltage +/- ΔU in the power winding, depending on whether the load voltage is to be increased or decreased. In the case of power factor correction, a control voltage ΔU is instead achieved which is phase-shifted by +/- π/2 in relation to the line voltage Uo ■ A combination of power factor correc¬ tion and voltage control means an arbitrary phase angle of the control voltage ΔU which can also be expressed as a complex voltage which is added to the line voltage Uo-
In the function as a current limiter, a control current Is is fed to the control winding which, for a load current Io through the power winding which falls below a predetermined maximum value, results in the magnetic flux Φ disappearing.
Then the control voltage ΔU across the power winding is reduced to the normally negligible resistive voltage drop. This is equivalent to a transformer with a short-circuited superconducting secondary coil which becomes traversed by the secondary current which causes the magnetic flux to disappear. This method is used in the patent 94/01470-1 SE for active damping of magnetic fields. If the load current Io exceeds the maximum value, the control current is no longer increased in a corresponding way but is maintained at a value corresponding to the maximum value. This means that the magnetic flux Φ becomes different from zero. For a load current Io through the power winding which exceeds the maximum value, a device accor- ding to the invention functions as a reactor which limits this current by achieving an inductive voltage drop across the power winding. By subsequently reducing the control current Is to zero, the device functions as a current-limiting reactor with a considerable inductance.
In the function as a harmonic filter, the control winding is fed with a control current which only contains the fundamental of the line voltage with a current intensity which is so adapted that the fundamental component of the magnetic flux disappears. The load current through the power winding then only "sees" one, in practice negligible, resistive load for the fundamental, but an inductive load for all the harmonics and also other disturbances, for example current pulses. A device according to the invention is thus made to function as a bandpass filter with the fundamental frequency as the centre frequency. The control unit may also be caused to give a con- trol current in opposition to current components through the power winding which do not belong to the fundamental; the device then functions as an active filter.
With a device according to the invention, it is possible to carry out the functions individually as described above. By Fourier series expansion of the control current Is and super¬ imposing selected frequencies on the control winding, it is furthermore possible to simultaneously carry out the functions in an optional combination with each other by controlling the different Fourier components of the control voltage ΔU with the Fourier components of the control current Is. It is thus possible, for example, to carry out voltage control as well as power factor correction on the fundamental of the line voltage Uo while simultaneously carrying out harmonic filtering on the other frequency components.
The invention may be regarded as an improvement of a so-called booster transformer, where the galvanic coupling between a winding of an excitation transformer and a winding of a series transformer, which only permits voltage control, is replaced by the control unit and the power amplifier. In this way, the plurality of control functions already described may be achieved.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a device according to the invention, connected to a network in the form of a power transformer and a load.
Figure 2 shows the relationship between uncorrected and corrected voltage in a vector diagram.
Figure 3 shows a non-sinusoidal line voltage, the control voltage of the device and a load voltage after filtering. Figures 4a and 4b show schematically combinations of an on¬ load tap changer with one or more devices according to the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 shows a device according to the invention, which is connected between a network in the form of a power transformer 1 and a load 2, symbolized by a resistor. The load 2 may consist of a network comprising a plurality of consumers. The power transformer has a primary winding 3 and a secondary winding 4. The voltage of the secondary winding corresponds to the above-mentioned line voltage Uo. In a preferred embodi¬ ment, the device comprises an iron core 6 with a power winding 5, a control winding 7 and a measuring winding 8 for deter¬ mining the magnetic flux Φ in the iron core. The power winding is connected in series with the secondary winding and the load, and a load current Io flows in the circuit. The control winding is fed from a power amplifier 9 which is controlled from a control unit 10. The power amplifier and the control unit are fed with current from a current supply device 11, which in turn is fed from an auxiliary winding 12 of the power transformer 1. This has the advantage that the frequency of the power supply corresponds to the frequency of the current in the control winding, which may simplify the design of the power amplifier. The voltage supply to the current supply device may also take place directly from the primary or secondary winding of the transformer.
Via suitable measuring means, the line voltage Uo, the load voltage U, the load current Io and the voltage VΦ across the measuring winding, which is proportional to a magnetic flux Φ common to the power winding and the control winding, are fed back to the control unit. Since ΔU and U fulfil the equation ΔU = U - Uo, also the combinations ΔU and Uo or ΔU and U may be supplied to the control unit instead of the combination U and UQ, depending on which combination of measurements is simplest to achieve. In that case, it is also necessary for ΔU to be measured; this is indicated in dashed lines in Figure 1.
According to the invention, the control unit is to be programmed such that, on the basis of the feedback signals and otherwise well-known relationships between these, it achieves, via the power amplifier, the control current Is to the control winding which is needed for the control voltage ΔU to become the proper supplementation of the line voltage Uo for the application in question. As described, the application may be voltage control of the load voltage U at varying line voltage and/or load, power factor correction, current limiting, filtering, etc., or some combination thereof.
In case of voltage control with respect to amplitude, the control voltage corresponds to the amplitude of that control error which is obtained on a comparison between the desired amplitude |u| and the actual amplitude of the load voltage, that is, |ΔU|= |U|- |Uo I • With access to the number of winding turns of the control and power windings and other data for the magnetic circuit, the relationship between the flux Φ for a given ΔU and the relationship between the flux Φ and the control current Is, respectively, may be determined. This means that the control unit, via the power amplifier, may generate that control current Is which gives a flux propor¬ tional to ΔU, in phase with or in opposition to the line voltage Uo, in the power winding.
With access to the relationship between the line voltage Uo and that control voltage ΔU with phase +/- π/2 relative to the phase of the line voltage which is needed for a given power factor correction of the phase of the load voltage, the ΔU necessary for a desired power factor correction may be deter¬ mined. The amplitude of the relevant load voltage is then determined from the relationship |u| 2= |Uo |2+ |Δu|2. When ΔU is determined, the control unit can generate the required control current via the power amplifier in the same way as described above.
A frequently occurring control case is that the load voltage U has to be controlled both in amplitude and in phase relative to a line voltage Uo • The task thus comprises, according to Figure 2, determining the ΔU, both from the amplitude and the phase point of view, which is needed for the vectorial sum of Uo and ΔU to correspond to the desired load voltage U. If the desired load voltage U is phase-shifted by an angle φ relative to the line voltage Uo, the amplitude of ΔU is determined according to
Figure imgf000011_0001
and the phase shift α between ΔU and Uo is determined from
α = arctan ((|U|sin φ)/(|u|cos φ - |UQ | ) )
With ΔU determined in this way, the control unit may generate the required control voltage via the power amplifier, in the same way as described above.
When a device according to the invention is to function as a current limiter, it is a precondition that, at a load current Iθ less than an allowed maximum current Iθmaχ/ it shall have as small an influence on the circuit as possible. The control unit is therefore adapted such that, at a load current less than the maximum current, it generates and adapts such a control current Is that the resultant flux from the control winding and the power winding is zero. This means that, at maximum load current Iθmax< there is a corresponding maximum control current Ismax- At zero flux, the control voltage ΔU across the power winding will consist of the normally negli- gible resistive voltage drop caused by the relevant load current and the resistance of the power winding. In a preferred embodiment as a current limiter, during a transition stage after the load current has exceeded the maximum current, the control unit is adapted to maintain the maximum control current Ismax- Because the load current becomes greater than Iθmaχ/ during the transition stage the flux will become different from zero which means that the circuit will have a limited addition of inductance. By redu¬ cing the control current to zero after the transition stage, which may amount to some twenty or thirty milliseconds, the device will function as a current limiting reactor with a considerable inductance.
In an. alternative embodiment as a current limiter, the reduction of the control current may take place immediately after the load current tends to exceed the maximum current, that is, the above-mentioned transition process is excluded.
The principle of the use of a device according to the inven¬ tion as an active filter is clear from Figures 3a, b and c. Figure 3a shows a non-sinusoidal line voltage Uo as a function of time t. The control unit is arranged with a Fourier filter which produces the sinusoidal fundamental component of the line voltage and forms that control voltage ΔU, shown in Figure 3b, which corresponds to the difference between the relevant line voltage and its sinusoidal fundamental compo¬ nent. With access to the necessary control voltage ΔU, in the same way as above, that control current Is may be generated which, via the power amplifier, gives a flux in the power winding proportional to ΔU.
When using the device as a passive filter for the fundamental component of a line voltage, the control voltage ΔU is to correspond to the fundamental component and the amplitude of the line voltage, which may both be extracted from the above- mentioned Fourier filter. In the same way as above, also in this case that control current Is may be generated which, via the power amplifier, gives a flux in the power winding propor¬ tional to ΔU.
Figure 4a and Figure 4b show schematically how at least one device according to the invention may be used for stepless voltage control together with an on-load tap changer of a power transformer or a reactor. In Figure 4a the terminals of an on-load tap changer are symbolized by the rings 13. The voltage step between two terminals is δu. Two consecutive terminals, each with a respective device according to the invention, symbolized by the coils 14 and 15, are connected to the point 16, where the voltage may be varied in a stepless manner between the voltage of the two terminals by the lower device 15 delivering a control voltage ΔUi = aδu and the upper device a control voltage ΔU2 = (a-l)δu, with 0 < a < 1. In
Figure 4b, one of the devices is replaced by a direct connec¬ tion 17 which is only connected when the device 16 provides the same control voltage ΔU as the voltage step δu between the terminals, such that the point 16 and the upper terminal lie on the same voltage.
Also other connections between an on-load tap changer and at least one device according to the invention are feasible.
Connecting an on-load tap changer in this way to at least one device according to the invention entails several advantages:
Contacts may be opened and closed in a voltage-free and hence discharge-free manner;
The voltage of a power transformer or a reactor may be controlled in a stepless manner;
The on-load tap changer may be designed with fewer terminals. A device for control of the voltage of the power transformer need only be dimensioned for one voltage step between the terminals.
In addition to the examples stated above, closely related fields of use as well as combinations thereof may be used within the scope of the invention. Thus, for example, a device according to the invention may be used at the same time for both power factor correction and filtering.

Claims

1. A device for performing, individually or in combination with each other, the functions of voltage control, power factor correction, current limiting and harmonic filtering at a network, with line voltage Uo, for feeding a load (2), which may comprise a plurality of consumers, with a load voltage U, with the aid of a control voltage ΔU and wherein the device comprises a controllable reactor comprising at least one control winding (7) and at least one power winding (5) for generating the control voltage ΔU, as well as a control unit (10) which, via at least one power amplifier (9) , delivers a control current Is to the control winding, and wherein the power winding is connected in series with the load, and wherein a load current Io flows through the power winding and the load, and wherein a measuring member (8) is adapted to sense the magnetic flux (Φ) of the controllable reactor and to deliver a flux voltage VΦ proportional to the magnetic flux, characterized in that, via measuring members, those signals which correspond to the line voltage Uo, the load voltage U, the control voltage ΔU, the load current Io and the flux voltage VΦ are fed back to the control unit which is programmed such that, on the basis of the feedback signals, it delivers via the power amplifier(s) such a control current Is to the control winding that the control voltage ΔU induced in the power winding supplements the line voltage Uo such that the relevant functions or function are/is achieved.
2. A device for voltage control according to claim 1, characterized in that a control error arisen during voltage control constitutes a control voltage ΔU and that the control unit (10), via the power amplifier (9), is adapted to generate a control current Is which provides a magnetic flux Φ, proportional to ΔU, in phase with or in opposition to the line voltage Uo, such that Uo + ΔU = U corresponds to the desired load voltage U.
3. A device for power factor correction according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10), via the power amplifier (9) , is adapted to generate a control current Is which corresponds to a magnetic flux Φ, which results in a control voltage ΔU which is phase-shifted relative to Uo by +/- π/2, such that the voltage amplitudes, symbolized by | |, fulfil the equation |Uo|2 + |Δu|2 = |u|2 where U is the desired load voltage.
4. A device for voltage control and power factor correction according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10) , via the power amplifier (9) , is adapted to generate a control current Is which corresponds to a magnetic flux Φ, which results in a control voltage ΔU which has such a phase and amplitude that the load voltage U is given a desired amplitude |uj and a desired phase shift φ towards the line voltage Uo-
5. A device for current limiting according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10), via the power amplifier (9) , is adapted to generate a control current Is to the control winding which, for a load current Io through the power winding which falls below a given maximum value Iθmaχ/ results in the magnetic flux Φ disappearing but which for a load current Io which exceeds the given maximum value does not exceed the corresponding maximum value Ismax °f tne control current and where the same control current Ig within a few tens of milliseconds drops to zero.
6. A device for current limiting according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10) , via the power amplifier (9) , is adapted to generate a control current Is to the control winding which, for a load current Io through the power winding which falls below a given maximum value, results in the magnetic flux Φ disappearing but where the same control current Is for a load current Io which exceeds the given maxi¬ mum value is immediately reduced to zero.
7. A device for passive harmonic filtering according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10), via the power amplifier (9) , is adapted to generate a control current Is which only contains the sinusoidal fundamental component of the line voltage and that the amplitude of the control current is such that the fundamental component of the magnetic flux disappears.
8. A device for active harmonic filtering according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit (10), via the power amplifier (9), is adapted to generate a control current Is which only contains the sinusoidal fundamental component of the line voltage, that the amplitude of the control current is so great that the fundamental component of the magnetic flux disappears and that the control current, in addition, contains the harmonics of the load current Io in opposition.
9. A device according to any of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the control winding is sectioned into part-windings.
10. A device according to claim 9, characterized in that a power amplifier (9) is arranged for each part-winding of the control winding.
11. A device according to any of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that it is arranged together with at least one on-load tap changer of a power transformer or a reactor for voltage con¬ trol between the terminals (13) of the on-load tap changer.
12. A device according to any of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the device is arranged adjacent to a power transformer (1).
13. A device according to claims 12, characterized in that the power supply to the power amplifier (9) takes place with at least one auxiliary winding (12) of the power transformer (1) ■
14. A device according to claims 12, characterized in that the power supply to the power amplifier (9) takes place from the primary or secondary winding of the power transformer.
15. A device according to any of claims 1 to 14, characterized in that the control winding and the power winding are wound on a common core (6) of magnetizable material.
PCT/SE1997/000424 1996-03-15 1997-03-13 Controllable reactor with feedback control winding WO1997034210A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE9600988A SE515458C2 (en) 1996-03-15 1996-03-15 Controllable reactor with feedback control winding
SE9600988-1 1996-03-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997034210A1 true WO1997034210A1 (en) 1997-09-18

Family

ID=20401795

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE1997/000424 WO1997034210A1 (en) 1996-03-15 1997-03-13 Controllable reactor with feedback control winding

Country Status (2)

Country Link
SE (1) SE515458C2 (en)
WO (1) WO1997034210A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003044612A1 (en) * 2001-11-21 2003-05-30 Magtech As Device with controllable impedance
US6788180B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2004-09-07 Magtech As Controllable transformer
WO2005050341A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-06-02 Jaroslav Foglar Voltage regulator including controllable transformer
WO2005076293A1 (en) * 2004-02-03 2005-08-18 Magtech As Power supply control methods and devices
US6933822B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2005-08-23 Magtech As Magnetically influenced current or voltage regulator and a magnetically influenced converter
US6965291B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2005-11-15 Magtech As Circuit component and transformer device with controllable impedance and with systems equipped with such devices
US7026905B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2006-04-11 Magtech As Magnetically controlled inductive device
WO2006087402A2 (en) * 2005-02-15 2006-08-24 Universidad De Sevilla Method for the continuous regulation of voltage ratio in transformers
US7180206B2 (en) 2002-12-12 2007-02-20 Magtech As System for voltage stabilization of power supply lines

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1513876A1 (en) * 1964-12-23 1969-09-18 Honeywell Inc Voltage regulator for alternating current supply
US3628057A (en) * 1970-06-19 1971-12-14 Allen Bradley Co Corrective circuit for an active narrow notch filter
WO1987001834A1 (en) * 1985-09-13 1987-03-26 Hasler Ag Electric power converter
US4833585A (en) * 1988-08-03 1989-05-23 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Zone filter
US5341281A (en) * 1993-05-14 1994-08-23 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Harmonic compensator using low leakage reactance transformer
WO1995003645A1 (en) * 1993-07-26 1995-02-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and arrangement for limiting short circuit current on an electric energy transmission line

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1513876A1 (en) * 1964-12-23 1969-09-18 Honeywell Inc Voltage regulator for alternating current supply
US3628057A (en) * 1970-06-19 1971-12-14 Allen Bradley Co Corrective circuit for an active narrow notch filter
WO1987001834A1 (en) * 1985-09-13 1987-03-26 Hasler Ag Electric power converter
US4833585A (en) * 1988-08-03 1989-05-23 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Zone filter
US5341281A (en) * 1993-05-14 1994-08-23 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Harmonic compensator using low leakage reactance transformer
WO1995003645A1 (en) * 1993-07-26 1995-02-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and arrangement for limiting short circuit current on an electric energy transmission line

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN, Vol. 13, No. 444, E-828; & JP,A,01 170 328 (NISSIN ELECTRIC CO LTD), 5 July 1989. *

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7193495B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2007-03-20 Espen Haugs Magnetically influenced current or voltage regulator and a magnetically influenced converter
US6933822B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2005-08-23 Magtech As Magnetically influenced current or voltage regulator and a magnetically influenced converter
US7026905B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2006-04-11 Magtech As Magnetically controlled inductive device
US7256678B2 (en) 2000-05-24 2007-08-14 Magtech As Magnetically controlled inductive device
US6788180B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2004-09-07 Magtech As Controllable transformer
WO2003044612A1 (en) * 2001-11-21 2003-05-30 Magtech As Device with controllable impedance
US6965291B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2005-11-15 Magtech As Circuit component and transformer device with controllable impedance and with systems equipped with such devices
US7061356B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2006-06-13 Magtech As Controllable transformer
CN100397277C (en) * 2001-11-21 2008-06-25 马格技术公司 Device with controllable impedance
US7180206B2 (en) 2002-12-12 2007-02-20 Magtech As System for voltage stabilization of power supply lines
WO2005050341A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-06-02 Jaroslav Foglar Voltage regulator including controllable transformer
WO2005076293A1 (en) * 2004-02-03 2005-08-18 Magtech As Power supply control methods and devices
ES2277500A1 (en) * 2005-02-15 2007-07-01 Universidad De Sevilla Method for the continuous regulation of voltage ratio in transformers
WO2006087402A3 (en) * 2005-02-15 2006-11-02 Univ Sevilla Method for the continuous regulation of voltage ratio in transformers
WO2006087402A2 (en) * 2005-02-15 2006-08-24 Universidad De Sevilla Method for the continuous regulation of voltage ratio in transformers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE9600988L (en) 1997-09-16
SE515458C2 (en) 2001-08-06
SE9600988D0 (en) 1996-03-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1565975B1 (en) A device and a method for control of power flow in a transmission line
US6127743A (en) Universal harmonic mitigating system
AU759545B2 (en) Universal harmonic mitigating system
EP1864305B1 (en) On-load tap changer
US8169756B2 (en) Fault current limiting
US3955134A (en) Reactance controller
US4286207A (en) High-power AC voltage stabilizer
US20050174127A1 (en) Circuit component and transformer device with controllable impedance and with systems equipped with such devices
EP2599180B1 (en) The apparatus compensating ground currents connected to phase conductors of a distribution system
WO1997034210A1 (en) Controllable reactor with feedback control winding
EP1841035B1 (en) Fault current limiting
EP1456728B1 (en) Device with controllable impedance
US2434493A (en) Voltage stabilizing transformer
CA1181806A (en) Method and device for continuously controlling the phase angle in electric energy transmission equipment
CA1175479A (en) Multi-voltage transformer input circuits with primary reactor voltage control
US6911810B2 (en) Reduction of energization transients in a three phase Y-connected load
US3684949A (en) Voltage regulator utilizing thyristor switch means
US3436600A (en) Reactance protection apparatus and method
Rastegar et al. A New Control Method to Overcome Sympathy Between Transformers using SSSC
NO324270B1 (en) Auto transformer device with magnetic air gap used with magnetically controllable inductor
JP2002218652A (en) Automatic voltage regulator
Kumari Study of Methods for Mitigation of Inrush Current in Transformer
Solak et al. EMTP testing of selected PST protection schemes
RU2141888C1 (en) Power source for arc welding
Lakkaraju Protection of a 138/34.5 kv transformer using SEL 387-6 relay

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CN JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 97532521

Format of ref document f/p: F

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase