US10147825B2 - Hybrid partial power processing system - Google Patents

Hybrid partial power processing system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US10147825B2
US10147825B2 US15/361,346 US201615361346A US10147825B2 US 10147825 B2 US10147825 B2 US 10147825B2 US 201615361346 A US201615361346 A US 201615361346A US 10147825 B2 US10147825 B2 US 10147825B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
power processing
power
processing system
module
dpp
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US15/361,346
Other versions
US20170149249A1 (en
Inventor
Ali Yaseen Elrayyah
Abdelkader Bousselham
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Qatar Foundation
Qatar Foundation for Education Science and Community Development
Original Assignee
Qatar Foundation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qatar Foundation filed Critical Qatar Foundation
Priority to US15/361,346 priority Critical patent/US10147825B2/en
Assigned to QATAR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT reassignment QATAR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BOUSSELHAM, ABDELKADER, DR., ELRAYYAH, ALI YASEEN, DR.
Publication of US20170149249A1 publication Critical patent/US20170149249A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US10147825B2 publication Critical patent/US10147825B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L31/00—Semiconductor devices sensitive to infrared radiation, light, electromagnetic radiation of shorter wavelength or corpuscular radiation and specially adapted either for the conversion of the energy of such radiation into electrical energy or for the control of electrical energy by such radiation; Processes or apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture or treatment thereof or of parts thereof; Details thereof
    • H01L31/02—Details
    • H01L31/02016—Circuit arrangements of general character for the devices
    • H01L31/02019—Circuit arrangements of general character for the devices for devices characterised by at least one potential jump barrier or surface barrier
    • H01L31/02021—Circuit arrangements of general character for the devices for devices characterised by at least one potential jump barrier or surface barrier for solar cells
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05F—SYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00—Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/66—Regulating electric power
    • G05F1/67—Regulating electric power to the maximum power available from a generator, e.g. from solar cell
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50—Photovoltaic [PV] energy
    • Y02E10/56—Power conversion systems, e.g. maximum power point trackers
    • Y02E10/58—

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to renewable energy interfacing with power systems, and particularly to a hybrid partial power processing (PPP) system of serially connected photovoltaic (PV) modules in a string.
  • PPP hybrid partial power processing
  • DC-PO DC power optimizer
  • DPP differential power processing DC/DC converters
  • the hybrid partial power processing system includes differential power processing converters DPPs having low power ratings, which are used to exchange differential power between two adjacent PV modules, or between PV modules and a line capacitor (C lin ) connected in series within the same string.
  • DPPs are considered to support bidirectional power flow, but unidirectional power flow operation could also be supported.
  • the DC power optimizing converter (DC-PO) is a DC/DC power converter used to feed current (power) from a PV module to C lin .
  • DC-PO is driven to track the maximum power point (MPP) of one PV module, and the MPP of each one of the remaining PV modules in the string is tracked by a DPP.
  • DC-PO supplies C lin with most of the current required to match the string current, while DPPs supply C lin with small current that corresponds to the difference in MPP power among the PV modules in the same string.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an exemplary hybridization of a PPP technique for processing partial power in a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a generalized hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and 3E are plots showing the output currents of first through fifth PV modules, respectively, in a simulation of a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention using a buck-boost type DC power optimizer (DC-PO).
  • DC-PO buck-boost type DC power optimizer
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and 4E are plots showing the duty cycles for the differential power processing converters (DPPs) and DC-PO used in the buck-boost simulation of FIGS. 3A-3E .
  • DPPs differential power processing converters
  • DC-PO DC-PO
  • FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, and 5E are plots showing the output currents of first through fifth PV modules, respectively, in a simulation of a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention using a buck-type DC power optimizer (DC-PO).
  • DC-PO buck-type DC power optimizer
  • FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, and 6E are plots showing the duty cycles for the differential power processing converters (DPPs) and DC-PO used in the buck simulation of FIGS. 5A-5E .
  • the hybrid partial power processing system includes differential power processing converter 106 b (DPP n ⁇ 1 ) and differential power processing converter 106 c (DPP n+1 ) where both of them have low rated power.
  • the converters 106 b and 106 c are used to exchange the differential power of the PV module 102 b (PV n ⁇ 1 ) and module 102 c (PV n+1 ), respectively, with the line capacitor 110 (C lin ).
  • the differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c could be of bidirectional type where the power can flow in both directions.
  • the differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c could be of unidirectional type, either feeding power to the line capacitor 110 (C lin ) or extracting power from it.
  • the DC power optimizing converter 104 (DC-PO) is a DC/DC converter used to feed current (power) from the PV module 101 (PV n ⁇ 1 ) to the line capacitor 110 (C lin ). At least one power exchanging DC-DC converter may be connected in parallel with the DC-PO 104 .
  • Differential power processing converter 106 b has one of its input/output ports connected across the terminals of PV module 102 b (PV n+1 ), and the other port connected across the line capacitor 110 .
  • differential power processing converter 106 c has one port connected across the terminals (upstream and downstream) of the line capacitor 110 .
  • the other port of differential power processing converter 106 c is connected across the terminals of PV module 102 c (module PV n+1 ).
  • the partial string comprises PV module 102 b connected in series with line capacitor 110 , which, in turn, is connected in series with PV module 102 c .
  • Most of the string current I str passes over the PV modules 102 b , 102 c , and the line capacitor 110 , while a small portion of I str passes over DPPs 106 b , 106 c.
  • FIG. 2 shows the complete structure 100 b of a PV string with the hybrid system for PPP (the PV modules 1021 , 102 a , 102 b being connected in series and to the downstream side of the line capacitor C lin , and the PV modules 102 c , 102 d , and 102 e being connected in series and to the upstream side of line capacitor C lin ).
  • the differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c are connected to the string in the same manner as the DPP connections shown in FIG. 1 , while each of the remaining differential power processing converters has PV modules connected in its two ports.
  • the differential power processing converter 106 a has the PV module 102 a (PV n ⁇ 2 ) connected across one of its ports, while the other port is connected across the PV module 102 b (PV n ⁇ 1 ).
  • DPP 1 1061 , DPP n ⁇ 2 106 a , DPP n ⁇ 1 106 b , DPP n+1 106 c , DPP n+1 106 c and DPP Np 106 e are shown to support bidirectional power flow, but unidirectional power flow operation could also be supported.
  • the converter DC-PO 104 is a DC/DC converter used to feed current (power) from the module PV n 101 to C lin .
  • the maximum power point (MPP) currents for PV n ⁇ 1 , PV n and PV n+1 in FIG. 1 be I m,n ⁇ 1 , I m,n and I m,n+1 , respectively.
  • the current I str that flows in the string could be different from I m,n ⁇ 1 , I m,n and I m,n+1 .
  • I m,n ⁇ 1 ⁇ I str ⁇ I m,n ⁇ 1 >0 (1)
  • the converter DPP n ⁇ 1 106 b can be driven such that the current I i,n ⁇ 1 shown in FIG. 1 becomes equal to ⁇ I m,n ⁇ 1 in Equation (1).
  • I m,n+1 ⁇ I str ⁇ I m,n+1 ⁇ 0
  • the converters DPP n ⁇ 1 106 b and DPP n+1 106 c process the currents I i,n ⁇ 1 and I i,n+1 , respectively, and supply/draw appropriate currents to/from the capacitor C lin , whose values maintain balance between the converter input and output power.
  • the output current of the converter DC-PO is driven independently to track the MPP of the module PV n .
  • the gain of the converter DC-PO is automatically adjusted such that the sum of all currents of DPP n ⁇ 1 , DPP n , DPP n+1 and DC-PO that flow to/from C lin becomes equal to the string current I str .
  • the MPP of each PV is tracked independently by a separate DC/DC converter. Accordingly, fast maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of the individual PV modules could be achieved using only one DC-PO and low cost DPPs. DPPs have low cost and low losses, as they process only a fraction of the power produced by PV modules.
  • the MPPT could be achieved all the time, since whenever there is an increase in the PV power, the voltage across C lin will increase, and whenever there is a reduction in the PV power, a drop will occur in this voltage.
  • the DC-PO always adjusts its duty ratio to track the MPP of PV n based on the voltage of C lin . Accordingly, low cost, high efficiency, modularity, simple control, simple structure, and fast MPPT could all be achieved in this system.
  • the module PV n and its DC-PO could be replaced with a DC/DC converter that feeds power from the two terminals of the entire string to the line capacitor.
  • a power source other than PV module could be used to replace PV n in the input port of DC-PO.
  • the hybrid PPP shown in FIG. 1 could be used to process the power in sub-modules within the same PV module.
  • more than one PV module could be connected in parallel or series across the same port of a DPP.
  • the converters DC-PO, DPP n ⁇ 1 and DPP n+1 could be non-isolated or isolated converters. Moreover, DPP n ⁇ 1 and DPP n+1 can be bidirectional, as well as unidirectional.
  • the converters DC-PO, DPP n ⁇ 1 and DPP n+1 can be buck, boost, buck-boost, resonant converters, and variations of these topologies in isolated and non-isolated forms.
  • FIG. 2 A generalized example of a PPP system is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the string in FIG. 2 has a number N P of PV modules connected in series.
  • the modules PV 1 , PV 2 , . . . PV n ⁇ 1 are connected in the lower part of the string below C lin , while the modules PV n+1 , PV n+2 , . . . PV Np are connected in the upper part above C lin .
  • the number of PV modules connected below C lin is equal to the number of PV modules connected above it.
  • these two numbers could be different, and it is also possible to have one of the two numbers as zero.
  • DPP x measures the current/voltage of PV x and supplies/draws current from the PV module or C lin connected to its other port such that the MPP of the module PV x is tracked.
  • the number of DPPs is equal to the number of modules, excluding the one that is driven by DC-PO. Therefore, local control for DPP x can be applied using only local measurements of voltages and currents in its two ports by a microcontroller in the DPP x circuit to track the MPP of PV x . It is clear that merely local control is needed for driving DPPs and DC-PO, which simplifies the system operation significantly and makes the system modular and easily scalable.
  • the output currents of the five modules are shown in plot series 300 of FIGS. 3A through 3E .
  • All PV modules maintained MPP operating throughout the system operation.
  • Positive duty ratio represents supplying power from the PV module toward the direction of C lin while negative duty ratios represent the case of absorbing current for the direction of C lin .
  • PV 1 and PV 2 have high MPP currents, they could achieve MPP operation by supplying extra currents toward the direction C lin , while PV 4 and PV 5 needed to consume current from the direction of C lin , and the values of their duty ratios, shown in plot series 400 of FIGS. 4A through 4E , reflect these facts.
  • These drawings show clearly fast MPPT through a simple and modular control system.
  • Plot series 500 of FIGS. 5A through 5E show the output currents of the PV modules where they match the required values of the MPP currents listed in Table 2.
  • the duty ratios are always negative, and they are adjusted to track the MPP of the various PV modules, as shown in plot series 600 of FIGS. 6A through 6E .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Dc-Dc Converters (AREA)

Abstract

The hybrid partial power processing system includes differential power processing converters DPPs having low power ratings, which are used to exchange differential power between two adjacent PV modules, or between PV modules and a line capacitor (Clin) connected in series within the same string. The exchange of differential power by DPPs is needed to track the maximum power point of each PV module in the string. The DC power optimizing converter (DC-PO) is a DC/DC power converter used to feed current (power) from a PV module to Clin. The DC-PO is driven to track the maximum power point (MPP) of one PV module, and the MPP of each one of the remaining PV modules in the string is tracked by a DPP.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/260,209, filed Nov. 25, 2015.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to renewable energy interfacing with power systems, and particularly to a hybrid partial power processing (PPP) system of serially connected photovoltaic (PV) modules in a string. In the presented PPP, currents are supplied to a capacitor connected in the string through one DC power optimizer (DC-PO) and several differential power processing DC/DC converters (DPP) to ensure maximum power point tracking of each one of the PV modules is properly tracked.
2. Description of the Related Art
Common practices to interface PV modules to utility grids are based on using central and string inverters. In these technologies, the same current passes over a number of serially connected PV modules. Unfortunately, this behavior may not allow the maximum power point (MPP) of each module to be tracked. Different factors, such as manufacturing variability, aging, shading, differences in orientation, and accumulation of dirt/dust, may cause mismatches in the MPP characteristics of serially connected PV modules. Thus, the required electric current to operate one module at its MPP could be different from the current required by other modules connected at the same string. Accordingly, the current that passes over every module needs to be controlled independently to ensure MPP operation of all PV modules. Previous attempts to accomplish this require costly components due to high voltage or current ratings, or complicated control algorithms to coordinate the modules.
Thus, a hybrid partial power processing system solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The hybrid partial power processing system includes differential power processing converters DPPs having low power ratings, which are used to exchange differential power between two adjacent PV modules, or between PV modules and a line capacitor (Clin) connected in series within the same string. The exchange of differential power by DPPs is needed to track the maximum power point of each PV module in the string. DPPs are considered to support bidirectional power flow, but unidirectional power flow operation could also be supported. The DC power optimizing converter (DC-PO) is a DC/DC power converter used to feed current (power) from a PV module to Clin. DC-PO is driven to track the maximum power point (MPP) of one PV module, and the MPP of each one of the remaining PV modules in the string is tracked by a DPP. DC-PO supplies Clin with most of the current required to match the string current, while DPPs supply Clin with small current that corresponds to the difference in MPP power among the PV modules in the same string. This feature allows low power and low cost differential power processing converters to be used with distributed, modular and simple control systems.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an exemplary hybridization of a PPP technique for processing partial power in a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a generalized hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention.
FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and 3E are plots showing the output currents of first through fifth PV modules, respectively, in a simulation of a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention using a buck-boost type DC power optimizer (DC-PO).
FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and 4E are plots showing the duty cycles for the differential power processing converters (DPPs) and DC-PO used in the buck-boost simulation of FIGS. 3A-3E.
FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, and 5E are plots showing the output currents of first through fifth PV modules, respectively, in a simulation of a hybrid partial power processing system according to the present invention using a buck-type DC power optimizer (DC-PO).
FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, and 6E are plots showing the duty cycles for the differential power processing converters (DPPs) and DC-PO used in the buck simulation of FIGS. 5A-5E.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As shown in FIG. 1, the hybrid partial power processing system (PPP hybridization 100 a) includes differential power processing converter 106 b (DPPn−1) and differential power processing converter 106 c (DPPn+1) where both of them have low rated power. The converters 106 b and 106 c are used to exchange the differential power of the PV module 102 b (PVn−1) and module 102 c (PVn+1), respectively, with the line capacitor 110 (Clin). In one embodiment, the differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c could be of bidirectional type where the power can flow in both directions. In other embodiments, the differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c could be of unidirectional type, either feeding power to the line capacitor 110 (Clin) or extracting power from it. The DC power optimizing converter 104 (DC-PO) is a DC/DC converter used to feed current (power) from the PV module 101 (PVn−1) to the line capacitor 110 (Clin). At least one power exchanging DC-DC converter may be connected in parallel with the DC-PO 104. Differential power processing converter 106 b has one of its input/output ports connected across the terminals of PV module 102 b (PVn+1), and the other port connected across the line capacitor 110. Similarly, differential power processing converter 106 c has one port connected across the terminals (upstream and downstream) of the line capacitor 110. The other port of differential power processing converter 106 c is connected across the terminals of PV module 102 c (module PVn+1). It should be understood that the partial string comprises PV module 102 b connected in series with line capacitor 110, which, in turn, is connected in series with PV module 102 c. Most of the string current Istr passes over the PV modules 102 b, 102 c, and the line capacitor 110, while a small portion of Istr passes over DPPs 106 b, 106 c.
FIG. 2 shows the complete structure 100 b of a PV string with the hybrid system for PPP (the PV modules 1021, 102 a, 102 b being connected in series and to the downstream side of the line capacitor Clin, and the PV modules 102 c, 102 d, and 102 e being connected in series and to the upstream side of line capacitor Clin). The differential power processing converters 106 b and 106 c are connected to the string in the same manner as the DPP connections shown in FIG. 1, while each of the remaining differential power processing converters has PV modules connected in its two ports. E.g., the differential power processing converter 106 a has the PV module 102 a (PVn−2) connected across one of its ports, while the other port is connected across the PV module 102 b (PVn−1). DPP1 1061, DPPn−2 106 a, DPPn−1 106 b, DPPn+1 106 c, DPPn+1 106 c and DPPNp 106 e are shown to support bidirectional power flow, but unidirectional power flow operation could also be supported. The converter DC-PO 104 is a DC/DC converter used to feed current (power) from the module PV n 101 to Clin.
Let the maximum power point (MPP) currents for PVn−1, PVn and PVn+1 in FIG. 1 be Im,n−1, Im,n and Im,n+1, respectively. In general, the current Istr that flows in the string could be different from Im,n−1, Im,n and Im,n+1. Assume that:
I m,n−1 −I str =ΔI m,n−1>0  (1)
In this case, the converter DPP n−1 106 b can be driven such that the current Ii,n−1 shown in FIG. 1 becomes equal to ΔIm,n−1 in Equation (1). On the other hand, consider that:
I m,n+1 −I str =ΔI m,n+1<0  (2)
The converter DPP n+1 106 c is then driven to track the MPP of PVn+1, which makes Ii,n+1=−ΔIm,n+1. The converters DPP n−1 106 b and DPP n+1 106 c process the currents Ii,n−1 and Ii,n+1, respectively, and supply/draw appropriate currents to/from the capacitor Clin, whose values maintain balance between the converter input and output power. The output current of the converter DC-PO is driven independently to track the MPP of the module PVn. The gain of the converter DC-PO is automatically adjusted such that the sum of all currents of DPPn−1, DPPn, DPPn+1 and DC-PO that flow to/from Clin becomes equal to the string current Istr. The MPP of each PV is tracked independently by a separate DC/DC converter. Accordingly, fast maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of the individual PV modules could be achieved using only one DC-PO and low cost DPPs. DPPs have low cost and low losses, as they process only a fraction of the power produced by PV modules. Clearly, the MPPT could be achieved all the time, since whenever there is an increase in the PV power, the voltage across Clin will increase, and whenever there is a reduction in the PV power, a drop will occur in this voltage. The DC-PO always adjusts its duty ratio to track the MPP of PVn based on the voltage of Clin. Accordingly, low cost, high efficiency, modularity, simple control, simple structure, and fast MPPT could all be achieved in this system.
In one embodiment, the module PVn and its DC-PO could be replaced with a DC/DC converter that feeds power from the two terminals of the entire string to the line capacitor. In another embodiment, a power source other than PV module could be used to replace PVn in the input port of DC-PO.
In some embodiments, the hybrid PPP shown in FIG. 1 could be used to process the power in sub-modules within the same PV module. In other embodiment, more than one PV module could be connected in parallel or series across the same port of a DPP.
The converters DC-PO, DPPn−1 and DPPn+1 could be non-isolated or isolated converters. Moreover, DPPn−1 and DPPn+1 can be bidirectional, as well as unidirectional. The converters DC-PO, DPPn−1 and DPPn+1 can be buck, boost, buck-boost, resonant converters, and variations of these topologies in isolated and non-isolated forms.
A generalized example of a PPP system is shown in FIG. 2. The string in FIG. 2 has a number NP of PV modules connected in series. The modules PV1, PV2, . . . PVn−1 are connected in the lower part of the string below Clin, while the modules PVn+1, PVn+2, . . . PVNp are connected in the upper part above Clin. In this example, the number of PV modules connected below Clin is equal to the number of PV modules connected above it. However, in general, these two numbers could be different, and it is also possible to have one of the two numbers as zero.
The MPP of module PVx is tracked by driving the converter DPPx, x=1, 2, . . . n−1, n+1, Np. DPPx measures the current/voltage of PVx and supplies/draws current from the PV module or Clin connected to its other port such that the MPP of the module PVx is tracked. The number of DPPs is equal to the number of modules, excluding the one that is driven by DC-PO. Therefore, local control for DPPx can be applied using only local measurements of voltages and currents in its two ports by a microcontroller in the DPPx circuit to track the MPP of PVx. It is clear that merely local control is needed for driving DPPs and DC-PO, which simplifies the system operation significantly and makes the system modular and easily scalable.
Two simulation studies were conducted to verify the effectiveness of the present method for PPP. In both studies, a string composed of five PV modules is considered. In the first simulation, the present system with buck-boost type DC-PO was tested, while in the second, a buck DC-PO was investigated, while the DPPs in both simulations are taken as buck-boost DC/DC converters. Bidirectional DPPs are used in the first simulation, and Table 1 shows the parameters of that simulation. From the table, it is clear that the PV modules have different MPP currents.
TABLE 1
Parameters of PPP Simulated System with Buck-Boost DC-PO
Im,1 12.5 A
Im,2 12.0 A
Im,3 12.0 A
Im,4 11.5 A
Im,5 11.0 A
DPP Inductor 600 μH
C
lin 2 mF
The output currents of the five modules are shown in plot series 300 of FIGS. 3A through 3E. All PV modules maintained MPP operating throughout the system operation. Positive duty ratio represents supplying power from the PV module toward the direction of Clin while negative duty ratios represent the case of absorbing current for the direction of Clin. Since PV1 and PV2 have high MPP currents, they could achieve MPP operation by supplying extra currents toward the direction Clin, while PV4 and PV5 needed to consume current from the direction of Clin, and the values of their duty ratios, shown in plot series 400 of FIGS. 4A through 4E, reflect these facts. These drawings show clearly fast MPPT through a simple and modular control system.
In the second simulation, a buck-type DC-PO was used, while the DPPs were of unidirectional type. The parameters of the simulation are listed in Table 2. Since all DPPs need to absorb currents from the Clin direction in the buck DC-PO simulation, their duty ratios must always be negative.
TABLE 2
Parameters of PPP simulated system with buck DC-PO
Im,1 12.5 A
Im,2 11.0 A
Im,3 12.5 A
Im,4 11.5 A
Im,5 11.0 A
DPP Inductor 600 μH
C
lin 2 mF
Plot series 500 of FIGS. 5A through 5E show the output currents of the PV modules where they match the required values of the MPP currents listed in Table 2. The duty ratios are always negative, and they are adjusted to track the MPP of the various PV modules, as shown in plot series 600 of FIGS. 6A through 6E.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (8)

We claim:
1. A hybrid partial power processing system, comprising:
a DC power optimizing converter (DC-PO) having an input and an output, the output of the DC-PO having a first output terminal and a second output terminal;
a photovoltaic (PV) module connected to the input of the DC-PO;
a line capacitor Clin having a downstream side and an upstream side, the downstream side being connected to the first output terminal of the DC-PO, the upstream side being connected to the second output terminal of the DC-PO;
at least one downstream PV module connected in a serial string to the downstream side of the line capacitor Clin;
at least one upstream PV module connected in a serial string to the upstream side of the line capacitor Clin; and
for each of the at least one downstream PV modules and for each of the at least one upstream PV modules, a corresponding differential power processing converter (DPP) having two differential leads connected in parallel across the corresponding downstream or upstream PV module and a third lead connected to a neighboring downstream or upstream PV module or the line capacitor Clin;
wherein the hybrid partial power processing system is configured to allow exchange of differential power between two adjacent PV modules or between a PV module and the line capacitor Clin, thereby aiding speed of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of the hybrid partial power processing system.
2. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein each of the DPP is selected from a group consisting of a bidirectional DPP and a unidirectional DPP.
3. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein said DC power optimizing converter (DC-PO) comprises a plurality of DC-POs connected across the line capacitor Clin.
4. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein the DPPs and said DC-PO are selected from a group consisting of isolated converters or non-isolated converters.
5. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein the DPPs and said DC-PO comprise converters selected from a group consisting of buck DC/DC converters, boost DC/DC converters, buck-boost DC/DC converters, and resonant DC/DC converters.
6. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein the two differential leads of said corresponding differential power processing converter (DPP) are connected across a plurality of the PV modules.
7. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, further comprising at least one power exchanging DC-DC converter connected in parallel with said DC-PO.
8. The hybrid partial power processing system according to claim 1, wherein said corresponding differential power processing converter (DPP) includes a microcontroller using only local measurements of voltages and currents in said DPPs two ports to track a maximum power point (MPP) of the corresponding PV module for local control of the MPPT.
US15/361,346 2015-11-25 2016-11-25 Hybrid partial power processing system Active 2037-04-21 US10147825B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/361,346 US10147825B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2016-11-25 Hybrid partial power processing system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562260209P 2015-11-25 2015-11-25
US15/361,346 US10147825B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2016-11-25 Hybrid partial power processing system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170149249A1 US20170149249A1 (en) 2017-05-25
US10147825B2 true US10147825B2 (en) 2018-12-04

Family

ID=58721268

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/361,346 Active 2037-04-21 US10147825B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2016-11-25 Hybrid partial power processing system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US10147825B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107508543B (en) * 2017-07-24 2019-06-04 北方工业大学 The normal structure and its power optimization method of characteristic mismatch photovoltaic group string
CN111682580B (en) * 2020-05-15 2023-10-03 盐城工学院 Control device of virtual series connection photovoltaic DPP voltage stabilizing system
KR102599736B1 (en) * 2022-01-18 2023-11-09 가천대학교 산학협력단 Differential power processing unit with state of health and by-pass circuit for the serial connected pv module

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120161527A1 (en) 2008-07-01 2012-06-28 Leo Francis Casey Photovoltaic dc/dc micro-converter
US8330299B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2012-12-11 General Electric Company DC to DC power converters and methods of controlling the same
US20140042815A1 (en) 2012-06-10 2014-02-13 The Regents of the University of Colorado, A Body Corporate Balancing, filtering and/or controlling series-connected cells
US20140049998A1 (en) 2012-08-16 2014-02-20 Leo F. Casey DC to AC Power Converter
US20160079761A1 (en) 2014-09-15 2016-03-17 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois System and method for power point tracking for photovoltaic cells

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120161527A1 (en) 2008-07-01 2012-06-28 Leo Francis Casey Photovoltaic dc/dc micro-converter
US8330299B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2012-12-11 General Electric Company DC to DC power converters and methods of controlling the same
US20140042815A1 (en) 2012-06-10 2014-02-13 The Regents of the University of Colorado, A Body Corporate Balancing, filtering and/or controlling series-connected cells
US20140049998A1 (en) 2012-08-16 2014-02-20 Leo F. Casey DC to AC Power Converter
US20160079761A1 (en) 2014-09-15 2016-03-17 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois System and method for power point tracking for photovoltaic cells

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Author: Agamy et al.; Title: An Efficient Partial Power Processing DC/DC Converter for Distributed PV Architectures; Date: Feb. 2014; Publisher: IEEE transactions on power electronics; vol. 29, No. 2; Pertinent pp.: 674-686. *
Shibin Qin et al., "A Distributed Approach to MPPT for PV Sub-Module Differential Power Processing", IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, Iss. 4 (Apr. 2015).

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20170149249A1 (en) 2017-05-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10651787B2 (en) Reconfigurable photovoltaic module
US9425338B2 (en) Solar system for generating electric power
US10147825B2 (en) Hybrid partial power processing system
US8664797B2 (en) Photovoltaic assembly and method of operating a photovoltaic assembly
US20130200709A1 (en) Techniques for Grid Coupling Photovoltaic Cells Using Ratiometric Voltage Conversion
US20120217800A1 (en) Solar power systems optimized for use in communications networks
US11888442B2 (en) Solar modules having solar sub cells with matrix connections between the solar sub cells
US8358489B2 (en) Smart photovoltaic panel and method for regulating power using same
CN111226368A (en) System and apparatus for outputting electric power and configuration method thereof
CN104953945A (en) High-efficiency photovoltaic power generation system and method
CN102545709B (en) Energy optimizing device suitable for solar power generation device
JP2015095227A (en) Power supply device
Liu et al. Modular differential power processing (mDPP)
Jeong et al. A scalable unit differential power processing system design for photovoltaic applications
Wang et al. Analysis and comparison of FPP and DPP structure based DMPPT PV system
Elrayyah et al. Feeding partial power into line capacitors for low cost and efficient MPPT of photovoltaic strings
Stauth et al. A distributed photovoltaic energy optimization system based on a sub-module resonant switched-capacitor implementation
CN112445264B (en) Operating voltage control circuit device
US11437536B2 (en) Solar array module system for generating electric power
JP7096194B2 (en) Operating point control circuit device for series-connected solar cells or other power sources
Udaykiran et al. Investigation of PV balancer architectures on practical solar photo voltaic system
AU2019383074A1 (en) A matcher for multi module solar string power generation systems and a method thereof
JP6515006B2 (en) Solar power system
JP2015156091A (en) Power distribution circuit of solar cell
Zhao et al. Design of module-integrated converters for photovoltaic strings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: QATAR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND COMMUN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ELRAYYAH, ALI YASEEN, DR.;BOUSSELHAM, ABDELKADER, DR.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20161123 TO 20161124;REEL/FRAME:040681/0701

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4