JP6375241B2 - A device for detecting abnormalities in the maintenance status of septic tanks - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an apparatus for detecting an abnormality in the maintenance status of the septic tank, more specifically, by centrally managing the maintenance information of the septic tank, and automatically evaluating the maintenance status based on that information, The present invention relates to an apparatus for quickly detecting an abnormality in an operation state so as to perform maintenance and water quality maintenance of septic tank equipment with higher accuracy.

  In large cities, sewage treatment systems equipped with large-scale sewers have been developed as sewage treatment systems from receiving sewage discharged from buildings and facilities to treating and draining. On the other hand, in areas where buildings and facilities are dispersed, it is difficult to install large-scale sewers in terms of costs. In these areas, distributed septic tanks are often used. Septic tanks play an important social role in preventing environmental pollution.

  The septic tanks used in private houses and local facilities vary in the configuration of equipment and equipment depending on the processing capacity and processing content, and even the septic tanks of the same scale differ in equipment and equipment manufacturers, In fact, each septic tank has a different configuration. Conventional septic tanks were manufactured according to the structural standards stipulated by law, but recently, septic tanks that have been newly established have been manufactured to meet the performance standards stipulated by laws and regulations, which also contributes to the diversification of septic tanks. It has become.

  Generally, the septic tank is installed by a construction company. The installed septic tanks are obliged to be inspected and cleaned several times every year according to the human tanks, and the practice is generally entrusted to businesses such as local organizations and companies. Maintenance inspection, cleaning, and water quality inspection of the septic tank are collectively referred to as maintenance management, and are conventionally performed as follows. When private housing or local facilities are constructed and a septic tank is installed, the company entrusted with the maintenance management of the septic tank must manage matters that should be managed based on the processing capacity, processing content, scale, and configuration of the septic tank. List up and create a management checklist. In that case, the facilities and equipment used in the septic tank are identified one by one and the items to be managed are listed up. The checklist for management of each septic tank created in this way is stored by the septic tank manager and the company entrusted with management of the septic tank, and is taken out and used when managing the septic tank.

  The maintenance and inspection of a conventional typical septic tank is performed as follows. The business operator entrusted with the maintenance and inspection of the septic tank first extracts a checklist for managing a plurality of septic tanks that perform maintenance and inspection in one day, and the operator circulates with it. The circulation order of the septic tank is determined in advance, and the circulation is performed in that order. When you arrive at the septic tank installation location, select the checklist for management that corresponds to the septic tank, and perform maintenance work for each displayed item. Then, the fact that it has been implemented is entered in the corresponding part of the management checklist. This is repeated for all items. When a fee is received from the requester, the fact that the fee has been stored is also entered in the management checklist. When the maintenance inspection of the septic tank is completed, a list of septic tanks in which the maintenance inspection has not been completed is found by looking at the list and moved to that place. Then, the same maintenance work as the previous septic tank is repeated. When all the septic tanks have been maintained and inspected, the management checklist will be brought back and organized, and the necessary data will be compiled. The same procedure is used for cleaning by a company entrusted with cleaning of the septic tank and water quality inspection of the septic tank by an inspection organization.

  So far, a septic tank management system disclosed in Patent Documents 1 to 7 has been developed for the purpose of reliably and efficiently maintaining and managing the septic tank. Patent Document 1 discloses a method for creating a septic tank checklist and a method for managing a septic tank using the created septic tank checklist. Patent Documents 2 to 4 disclose portable input / output terminals for septic tank management. Patent document 5 discloses the system which extracts the check sheet | seat of the said septic tank from the standard septic tank check sheet | seat based on the information of the equipment and apparatus used for a septic tank. Patent Document 6 discloses an apparatus for creating a record slip for facilitating inspection of a septic tank. Patent Document 7 discloses a system for supporting the installation of a septic tank.

JP 2002-230145 A JP 2004-268024 A JP 2004-268025 A JP 2004-268026 A JP 2005-279440 A JP 2006-110483 A JP 2009-087239 A

  As described above, the operation and maintenance of the septic tank involves a plurality of companies such as manufacturers, construction companies, maintenance / inspection companies, cleaning companies, and inspection organizations. Therefore, in a conventional septic tank maintenance management system, maintenance is rarely performed by a single company alone, and the septic tank is a network of companies consisting of manufacturers, construction contractors, maintenance and inspection contractors, cleaning contractors, inspection organizations, etc. It is common to operate a maintenance system. However, since the septic tank management information in the maintenance management system is individually managed by each member, it is impossible to evaluate and confirm the operation status of the maintenance management system as a whole. For this reason, it is difficult to detect inconsistencies or contradictions in information between the operator networks, and as a result, after each problem occurs, the relevance is discovered by the post-survey. In fact, the inspection frequency of the most commonly used domestic septic tanks in Japan is at least once every four months (as of 2015) by law, and it is also possible to obtain management information between septic tank maintenance management networks. Differences in time occur individually, which hinders the provision of real-time maintenance services due to delays in response to treatment.

  According to the conventional septic tank management system as disclosed in Patent Documents 1 to 7 described above, each business operator can manage the septic tank reliably and efficiently, but information inconsistencies and contradictions among multiple business operators can be avoided. No means for detection is provided.

  Therefore, the present invention centrally manages the maintenance information generated in the septic tank maintenance management system, and automatically evaluates the maintenance status based on that information, so that abnormalities in the management status can be detected quickly and more accurately. A septic tank maintenance status abnormality detection device is provided to enable high maintenance and water quality maintenance.

  According to one aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a septic tank maintenance management state abnormality detection device for detecting an abnormality in installation and maintenance of a septic tank. The apparatus includes a computer and storage means. The storage means is connected to a computer and is the equipment standard set for the installation and maintenance of the septic tank, and the data regarding the actual situation of the installation and maintenance of the septic tank, and the actual condition of the equipment created during the maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank The data, the water quality standard to be satisfied by the treated water discharged from the inside of the septic tank, and the water quality inspection result data obtained by inspecting the quality of the treated water discharged from the inside of the septic tank are stored. The computer includes equipment evaluation means, water quality evaluation means, and primary evaluation means. The equipment evaluation means reads the equipment standards and the actual equipment data from the storage means, compares the equipment standards and the actual equipment data to determine whether the actual equipment data conforms to the equipment standards, and the actual equipment data is the equipment standards. The equipment normal information is output if the equipment conforms to the above, and the equipment abnormality information is outputted if the equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment standards. The water quality evaluation means reads the water quality standard and the water quality test result data from the storage means, compares the water quality standard and the water quality test result data, determines whether the water quality test result data conforms to the water quality standard, and the water quality test result. When the data conforms to the water quality standard, the normal water quality information is output, and when the water quality test result data does not conform to the water quality standard, the water quality abnormality information is output. The primary evaluation means acquires the equipment normal information or equipment abnormality information generated by the equipment evaluation means and the water quality normal information or water quality abnormality information generated by the water quality evaluation means, and the acquired information is the equipment normal information and water quality normality. In the case of a combination with information, a normal judgment is output, and when the acquired information is a combination of equipment abnormality information and water quality normal information, an equipment abnormality judgment is output, and the acquired information is equipment normal information and water quality abnormality information. In the case of a combination, the water quality abnormality determination is output, and when the acquired information is a combination of equipment abnormality information and water quality abnormality information, an audit determination is output.

  In one embodiment, the storage means further stores past facility actual data that is past facility actual data of the septic tank. The past facility actual state data includes past inspection water quality data that is water quality data inspected at the time of maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank. The computer further includes progress confirmation means. When the progress confirmation means obtains the normal judgment output from the primary evaluation means, it obtains the past inspection water quality data included in the past facility actual data from the storage means, compares the past inspection water quality data with the water quality standard, and the past. It is judged whether the inspection water quality data meets the water quality standard, and if the past inspection water quality data conforms to the water quality standard, an error-free judgment is output, and if the past inspection water quality data does not meet the water quality standard, the past inspection Outputs water quality abnormality judgment.

  In one embodiment, the storage means further stores a facility inspection standard that is a criterion for facility actual condition data set to detect a problem in the maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank, and the computer detects the first management abnormality detection. Means are further included. When the first management abnormality detection means acquires the equipment abnormality determination output from the primary evaluation means, or when it acquires the past inspection water quality abnormality determination output from the progress confirmation means, the past management actual condition data from the storage means When equipment inspection standards are acquired, past equipment actual data and equipment inspection standards are compared to determine whether past equipment actual data meets equipment inspection standards, and past equipment actual data meets equipment inspection standards Output a follow-up observation / cause pursuit determination, and if past facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard, a management status confirmation determination is output.

  In one embodiment, the storage means is a standard for a plurality of facility actual data, which is past facility actual data of a plurality of septic tanks, and a facility actual data set so as to detect problems in septic tank maintenance inspection or cleaning. Further storing certain equipment inspection standards, the computer further includes a follow-up / cause pursuit means. When the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means obtains the water quality abnormality judgment output from the primary evaluation, it obtains multiple equipment actual data and equipment inspection standards from the storage means, and uses the multiple equipment actual data to determine the equipment of the septic tank to be judged. Extract the data created during maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the actual data, compare each of the extracted multiple equipment actual data with the equipment inspection standards, and each of the extracted multiple equipment actual data If the extracted multiple equipment actual data meets the equipment inspection standards, a follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is output and the extracted multiple equipment actual data is If the inspection standard is not met, a determination of improvement is output.

  In one embodiment, the storage means further stores an audit standard, which is a standard for facility actual data set to detect improper maintenance or cleaning of the septic tank, and the computer further includes a guidance evaluation means. Including. When the guidance evaluation means obtains the audit judgment output from the primary evaluation, or when it obtains the necessary improvement judgment output from the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means, the multiple equipment actual condition data and the audit standard are obtained from the storage means. Acquired and extracted from the multiple equipment actual data, created during maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same operator as the actual equipment data of the septic tank to be judged, and compares the extracted multiple equipment actual data with the audit criteria It is determined whether or not the extracted multiple facility actual data meets the audit standards, and if the extracted multiple facility actual data meets the audit standards, an improvement request determination is output, and the extracted multiple facilities If the actual data does not meet the auditing standards, a guidance decision is output.

  In one embodiment, the storage means further stores past facility actual data that is past facility actual data of the septic tank, and the computer further includes second management abnormality detection means. When the second management abnormality detection means acquires the improvement request determination output from the instruction evaluation means, the second management abnormality detection means acquires the past equipment actual data and the equipment inspection standard from the storage means, To determine whether the past equipment actual data meets the equipment inspection standards, and if the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standards, a follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is output and the past equipment actual data is output. If it does not meet the equipment inspection standards, a management status confirmation judgment is output.

  According to one aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a program including program code that is executed by an electronic computer to cause the electronic computer to function as a computer included in the above-described septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection device.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to detect inconsistencies and contradictions in information among a plurality of business operators in septic tank maintenance, thereby quickly recognizing problems related to septic tank maintenance and, if necessary, It becomes possible to take measures such as request for improvement, inquiry, and guidance for the business operator who performed the management.

It is a figure which shows the outline | summary of the data flow and processing flow of the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detector which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the exemplary hardware constitutions of the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detector which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the concrete functional block and processing flow of the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection apparatus which concern on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the example of the item of provider information. It is a figure which shows the example of a water quality standard. It is a figure which shows the example of the item of equipment basic information. It is a figure which shows the example of an equipment standard. It is a figure which shows the example of an equipment inspection standard. It is a figure which shows the example of an audit standard. It is a figure showing the example of a display of the totalization table which totaled the number for every kind of secondary judgment for every company which performs maintenance check or cleaning of a septic tank. It is a figure showing the example of a display of the management situation for every company who performs maintenance check or cleaning of a septic tank. It is a figure which shows the processing flow of the primary evaluation performed in the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detector which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the processing flow of the progress confirmation means in the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the processing flow of the 1st management abnormality detection means in the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the processing flow of a follow-up observation / cause investigation means in the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the processing flow of the instruction | indication evaluation required means in the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention.

  First, the operation of the apparatus 1 for detecting an abnormality in the maintenance status of the septic tank using the septic tank maintenance status abnormality detection apparatus 1 (hereinafter also simply referred to as “apparatus 1”) according to an embodiment of the present invention, and Explain how to use it. The configuration of the device 1 that realizes the operation of the device 1 will be described later.

  An outline of the operation of the apparatus 1 will be described. Please refer to FIG. The apparatus 1 performs primary evaluation that is behavioral evaluation of septic tank maintenance based on various input data. The purpose of the primary evaluation is to check the management behavior of businesses by evaluating the consistency between the actual situation of septic tank maintenance and cleaning based on laws and regulations and the results of third-party assessment of the quality of discharged water. It is. Furthermore, the apparatus 1 performs the secondary evaluation using the result of the primary evaluation. The purpose of the secondary evaluation is to automatically extract and identify problems by evaluating the appropriateness of management contents as a result of management actions, and to identify correction requests or cause investigations. A more specific operation of the apparatus 1 is as follows.

  The apparatus 1 stores a water quality standard, which is a standard of water quality to be satisfied by the treated water discharged from the inside of the septic tank. An example of water quality standards is shown in FIG.

  The user of the apparatus 1 registers information on a business operator who maintains and manages the septic tank in the apparatus 1. An example of the item of business operator information is shown in FIG.

  When newly installing a septic tank, the user of the apparatus 1 inputs equipment basic information including the user of the septic tank, the installation location, the configuration of equipment and equipment, and the like to the apparatus 1 based on an application from the installer. . An example of the item of equipment basic information is shown in FIG. The equipment basic information input to the device 1 is stored in the device 1.

  Furthermore, the user of the device 1 creates the equipment standard of the septic tank to be installed so that it conforms to the laws and guidelines related to the septic tank and the instructions created by the septic tank manufacturer, based on the basic equipment information. Input to device 1. At this time, in the apparatus 1, the equipment standard items corresponding to the various equipment and equipment used in the septic tank are registered in advance, and the user of the apparatus 1 can set the septic tank to be installed among those items. The equipment standard of the septic tank to be installed can be created by selecting the equipment corresponding to the equipment and equipment used in the installation. The facility standard includes inspection items for the quality of treated water discharged from the septic tank. An example of equipment standard items is shown in FIG. The equipment standard input to the device 1 is stored in the device 1.

  The installed septic tank is regularly maintained according to the law. Typically, the maintenance inspection is performed by a maintenance inspection company, and the cleaning is performed by a cleaning company under commission from the septic tank manager. When performing a maintenance check, the maintenance checker carries, for example, a terminal connected to the device 1 wirelessly via a network, instead of the conventional management checklist (or along with the management checklist). To do. Based on the information managed by the apparatus 1, a list of septic tanks in which a maintenance inspection company carrying the terminal is in charge of maintenance inspection is displayed on the terminal. A maintenance inspection company selects one septic tank which is going to perform maintenance inspection from a list. Then, the equipment standard of the septic tank memorize | stored in the apparatus 1 is displayed on a terminal, and it will be in the state which can input the actual condition of each item of equipment standard. The business operator inputs the actual condition of each item to the terminal on the spot based on the result of the maintenance inspection. The actual condition of each input item is transmitted from the terminal to the apparatus 1 as facility actual data. When the cleaning company cleans the septic tank, it is the same as when the maintenance inspection company performs maintenance inspection.

  Upon receiving the facility actual data, the device 1 stores it. Furthermore, the device 1 generates facility evaluation information by comparing the facility actual state data with the facility standard. The equipment evaluation information is either equipment normal information indicating that all items of the actual equipment data conform to the equipment standards, or equipment abnormal information indicating that any item of the actual equipment data does not conform to the equipment standards. It is. As an example of a specific evaluation method, if there is a value of the corresponding equipment actual data item for each item of the equipment standard (that is, if there is no input omission), all of the actual equipment data regardless of its contents It can be evaluated that the item meets equipment standards. The device 1 stores the generated facility evaluation information.

  In addition, the installed septic tanks are regularly subjected to legal water quality inspections by an inspection organization. When performing a water quality test, for example, the inspection organization replaces a terminal connected to the device 1 via a wireless network with a conventional water quality checklist (or in conjunction with a water quality checklist). Carry with you. The inspection organization selects one septic tank from which the water quality inspection is to be performed from the list displayed on the terminal 1. Then, a list of water quality standard items is displayed on the terminal, and the test result of each item can be input. The inspection organization inputs the result of each inspection item to the terminal on the spot based on the result of the water quality inspection. The result of each input inspection item is transmitted from the terminal to the apparatus 1 as water quality test result data.

  When the apparatus 1 receives the water quality test result data, it stores it. Furthermore, the apparatus 1 produces | generates water quality evaluation information by comparing water quality test result data with a water quality reference | standard. The water quality evaluation information is either water quality normal information indicating that all items of the water quality test result data conform to the water quality standard, or water quality abnormality information indicating that any item of the water quality test result data does not conform to the water quality standard. Either. The device 1 stores the generated water quality evaluation information.

  As shown in FIG. 3, when facility evaluation information and water quality evaluation information are stored for one septic tank (referred to as “target septic tank”), the apparatus 1 performs a primary evaluation of the target septic tank according to the evaluation information. . The primary determination that is the result of the primary evaluation is any of normal determination, equipment abnormality determination, water quality abnormality determination, and audit determination. Specifically, the apparatus 1 determines the primary determination as follows based on the facility evaluation information and the water quality evaluation information.

  When the equipment evaluation information is equipment normal information and the water quality evaluation information is water quality normal information, the primary determination is normal. When the apparatus 1 outputs a normal determination as the primary determination, the user of the apparatus 1 can understand that there is no problem in the maintenance management of the target septic tank and the state of the target septic tank is good.

  When the equipment evaluation information is equipment abnormality information and the water quality evaluation information is water quality normal information, the primary judgment is equipment abnormality judgment. When the apparatus 1 outputs the equipment abnormality determination as the primary determination, the user of the apparatus 1 understands that the target septic tank is in good condition although there may be a problem in the maintenance management of the target septic tank. be able to.

  When the equipment evaluation information is equipment normal information and the water quality evaluation information is water quality abnormality information, the primary judgment is a water quality abnormality judgment. When the apparatus 1 outputs the water quality abnormality determination as the primary determination, the user of the apparatus 1 can understand that the state of the target septic tank is not good.

  When the equipment evaluation information is equipment abnormality information and the water quality evaluation information is water quality abnormality information, the primary judgment is an audit judgment. When the device 1 outputs an audit determination as the primary determination, the user of the device 1 may not be in a good state of the target septic tank, and the maintenance of the target septic tank may be inappropriately performed as the cause. It can be understood that there is.

  The device 1 stores the primary determination and can output or transmit it to the outside as necessary. In the septic tank maintenance state abnormality detection device according to another embodiment of the present invention, the primary determination may be a final output and the secondary evaluation described below may not be performed.

  Next, the device 1 performs a secondary evaluation of the target septic tank. The secondary evaluation includes progress confirmation evaluation, management abnormality detection evaluation, follow-up observation / cause pursuit evaluation, and evaluation requiring guidance. The apparatus 1 selects and executes the first to be performed among these secondary evaluations according to the primary determination, and determines and outputs the secondary determination that is the result of the secondary evaluation. The relationship between the primary determination and the secondary evaluation to be performed first, and the contents of the secondary evaluation are as shown in FIG. 3 and are specifically as follows.

  When the primary determination is a normal determination, the apparatus 1 performs a progress confirmation evaluation as the first secondary evaluation. The result of the progress confirmation evaluation is either the no abnormality determination or the past inspection water quality abnormality determination. The contents of the progress confirmation evaluation are as follows. That is, the apparatus 1 stores all or a part (for example, the two most recent cases) of the past facility actual data (referred to as “past facility actual data”) of the stored target septic tanks. Compare water quality data (referred to as “past inspection water quality data”) checked during maintenance inspection or cleaning with water quality standards. The result of the progress confirmation evaluation is that all past inspection water quality data compared with the water quality standard conforms to the water quality standard, and no abnormality is judged.If any of the past inspection water quality data does not conform to the water quality standard, the past inspection is performed. The water quality abnormality is determined. When the result of the progress check evaluation is a determination of no abnormality, the determination of no abnormality is set as a secondary determination as it is. The user of the device 1 can understand that there is no problem in the target septic tank when the device 1 outputs a determination of no abnormality as the secondary determination. On the other hand, when the result of the progress check evaluation is a past inspection water quality abnormality determination, the apparatus 1 subsequently performs a management abnormality detection evaluation to determine a secondary determination. In the septic tank maintenance status abnormality detection device according to another embodiment of the present invention, the past inspection water quality abnormality determination is performed without performing the management abnormality detection evaluation when the result of the progress confirmation evaluation is the past inspection water quality abnormality determination. May be a secondary determination.

  When the primary determination is an equipment abnormality determination, the device 1 performs the first management abnormality detection evaluation as the first secondary evaluation. Moreover, also when the result of the above-described progress confirmation evaluation is a past inspection water quality abnormality determination, the device 1 performs the first management abnormality detection evaluation. The contents of the first management abnormality detection evaluation are as follows. That is, the device 1 compares all or a part of the stored past facility actual data (for example, the latest three) with the stored facility inspection standard. The equipment inspection standard is a standard for the actual equipment data set so as to detect a management problem of the septic tank. An example of equipment inspection criteria is shown in FIG. As a result of the first management abnormality detection evaluation, if all the past equipment actual data compared with the equipment inspection standard conforms to the equipment inspection standard, follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is made. If the equipment does not conform to the equipment inspection standards, the management status must be confirmed. In any case, the result of the first management abnormality detection evaluation is set as the secondary determination. The user of the device 1 understands that when the device 1 outputs the follow-up observation / cause pursuit determination as the secondary determination, there is a problem in the target septic tank, but the cause is other than maintenance inspection or cleaning. More specifically, a deficiency in installation or an error in water quality inspection is suspected. Therefore, the user of the apparatus 1 can investigate the installation state of the target septic tank and the record of the water quality inspection to investigate the cause, or can observe the progress as it is. On the other hand, when the device 1 outputs a management status confirmation determination as a secondary determination, it can be understood that the target septic tank has a problem due to maintenance inspection or cleaning, and the problem is pointed out to the operator. Request improvement.

  When the primary determination is a water quality abnormality determination, the apparatus 1 performs follow-up observation and cause follow-up evaluation as the first secondary evaluation. The contents of follow-up observation and follow-up investigation are as follows. In other words, the apparatus 1 can select the equipment of the target septic tank from all or a part (for example, the latest three years) of the past equipment actual data (referred to as “multiple equipment actual data”) of a plurality of stored septic tanks. The data created at the time of maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the actual data is extracted, and each is compared with the equipment inspection standard. The result of follow-up observation / cause investigation is determined as follow-up / cause pursuit judgment when all past equipment actual data compared with the equipment inspection standard meets the equipment inspection standard. If it does not meet the equipment inspection standards, it will be judged as requiring improvement. If the result of the follow-up observation / cause pursuit evaluation is a follow-up observation / cause follow-up determination, the follow-up observation / cause follow-up determination is used as the secondary determination. As described above, when the device 1 outputs the follow-up observation / cause pursuit determination as the secondary determination, the user of the device 1 has a problem in the target septic tank, but the cause is other than maintenance inspection or cleaning. I can understand. On the other hand, when the result of the follow-up observation / cause pursuit evaluation is a determination of improvement required, the apparatus 1 subsequently performs a guidance evaluation and determines a secondary determination. In the septic tank maintenance status abnormality detection device according to another embodiment of the present invention, if the result of follow-up observation / cause pursuit evaluation is a determination of improvement required, the determination of improvement required is not performed without performing the instruction evaluation required. It is good also as a next determination.

  When the primary determination is an audit determination, the apparatus 1 performs a guidance evaluation as the first secondary evaluation. In addition, even when the result of the above-described follow-up observation / cause pursuit evaluation is a determination of improvement required, the apparatus 1 performs the instruction evaluation required. The contents of the guidance evaluation required are as follows. In other words, the device 1 is created at the time of maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the equipment actual data of the target septic tank, from all or part of the stored equipment actual data (for example, for the latest three years). Extract what has been done and evaluate them based on stored audit criteria. The auditing standard is a standard for facility actual data set so as to detect improper maintenance or cleaning of the septic tank. For example, the number of septic tanks that were managed and inspected by a business operator in one day To monitor maintenance inspections or cleaning fraud such as whether the number of septic tanks that can be maintained and checked per day calculated from the time required for maintenance and inspection of one septic tank and the working time per day is exceeded. Judgment items that have been found empirically effective can be included. FIG. 9 shows a specific example of the check contents and check method of the audit standard. In this example, when the number of corresponding items reaches a predetermined ratio as a result of the check, it is determined that the plurality of facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard. The result of the guidance evaluation required is determined as an improvement request when the plurality of facility actual data conforms to the facility inspection standard, and is determined as requiring guidance when the plurality of facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard. When the result of the instruction evaluation requiring is the improvement request determination, the device 1 subsequently performs the second management abnormality detection evaluation and determines the secondary determination. The contents of the second management abnormality detection evaluation can be the same as the contents of the first management abnormality detection evaluation described above. In the septic tank maintenance status abnormality detection device according to another embodiment of the present invention, when the result of the required guidance evaluation is an improvement request determination, the improvement request determination is performed without performing the second management abnormality detection evaluation. It is good also as a secondary determination. On the other hand, in the apparatus 1, when the result of the guidance required evaluation is a guidance required determination, the guidance required determination is directly used as the secondary determination. When the device 1 outputs a determination requiring guidance as a secondary determination, the user of the device 1 has a serious nonconformity in the maintenance inspection or cleaning of the target septic tank, and makes an inquiry or guidance to the operator. I understand that it should be.

  As described above, the device 1 determines the secondary determination that is the result of the secondary evaluation of the target septic tank. The device 1 can store the secondary determination and output it to the outside.

  The device 1 can notify the user of the device 1 of the secondary determination by e-mail or the like as necessary. The device 1 can be set to notify all secondary determinations, but according to given conditions, for example, notification only when the secondary determination is a management status confirmation determination or a guidance required determination. It is also possible to set to notify only some secondary determinations. The user of the apparatus 1 recognizes the problem regarding the management of the septic tank quickly by receiving the notification of the secondary determination, and if necessary, requests for improvement, inquiries, and guidance to the business operator who performed the maintenance management of the septic tank. It becomes possible to take measures such as.

  The apparatus 1 can total and output the secondary determination of each septic tank stored in the apparatus 1 as necessary. For example, the apparatus 1 can total the secondary determination of the septic tank that the business operator is in charge of maintenance management for each business operator that performs maintenance management of the septic tank, and can output a list. The list can be, for example, a matrix-type table in which rows are business operators and columns are secondary determination types. An example of the output format of the list of the secondary determination tabulation results is shown in FIG. In this example, “G” in the column name indicates no abnormality determination, “O” indicates a management status confirmation determination, “P” indicates follow-up / cause pursuit determination, and “M” indicates guidance determination required. The total result of the primary determination can also be output in the same format. In this case, normal determination, equipment abnormality determination, water quality abnormality determination, and audit determination may be displayed in a column. Moreover, the example of the output format which displayed management conditions, such as the number of cases of secondary determination for every provider, is shown in FIG. The user of the device 1 can determine, for example, that guidance is given to a business operator having a high ratio of judgments requiring guidance by looking at the output list and the management status of each business operator. .

  Next, the configuration of the device 1 that realizes the operation of the device 1 will be described. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary hardware configuration of the device 1. The apparatus 1 includes a computer 110 and a storage unit 120.

  The computer 110 connects a central processing unit (CPU) 111, storage devices such as a RAM 112, a ROM 113, and a hard disk drive (HDD) 114 that store various programs and data executed by the central processing unit, and these devices. It can be realized using a general-purpose computer having a bus 117. The computer 110 can further include an input / output interface 115. The input / output interface 115 is a drive for inputting / outputting data to / from an external recording medium such as a CD-ROM or a DVD-ROM as necessary. A device, an input device such as a keyboard or a mouse, an output device such as a CRT, a liquid crystal display, or a printer can be connected. The computer 110 may further include a communication interface 116 for communicating with other devices or networks.

  Each means included in the computer 110 of the apparatus 1, that is, equipment evaluation means 211, water quality evaluation means 212, primary evaluation means 213, progress confirmation means 221, first management abnormality detection means 222, follow-up observation / cause investigation means 223, required The instruction evaluation unit 224 and the second management abnormality detection unit 225 are realized by the central processing unit 111 executing a program P (not shown) for causing the central processing unit 111 to execute processing of each unit. . As an example, the program P can be stored in the hard disk drive 114 in advance. The central processing unit 111 can copy the program P stored in the hard disk drive 114 into the RAM 112 and can execute it while reading the program P copied into the RAM 112. As another example, the program P can be stored in the ROM 113 in advance, and the central processing unit 111 can be executed while reading the program P stored in the ROM 113.

  The equipment standard, equipment actual data, water quality standard, and water quality test result data input to the device 1 can be input using, for example, an input device connected to the input / output interface 115 provided in the computer 110, or The data can be input from another device connected directly to the communication interface 116 included in the computer 110 or via a network.

  The apparatus 1 can output the primary determination or the secondary determination or the aggregation thereof, for example, to an output device connected to the input / output interface 115 included in the computer 110, or directly to the communication interface 116 included in the computer 110. Alternatively, it can be output to another connected device via a network. If necessary, the device 1 can notify the user of the device 1 by e-mail or the like of the secondary determination via a device or network connected to the communication interface 116.

  The storage unit 120 includes a storage medium such as a hard disk drive or a flash memory. In the present embodiment, the storage unit 120 is illustrated as being provided outside the computer 110, but the embodiment of the present invention is not limited to this, and the storage unit 120 is built in the computer 110. The RAM 112, the ROM 113, or the hard disk drive 114 may be used, or these may be used in combination with a storage medium provided outside the computer 110. In any embodiment, the storage unit 120 stores facility standards, facility actual data, water quality standards, water quality inspection result data, facility inspection standards, and audit standards input to the apparatus 1.

  As shown as functional blocks in FIG. 3, the computer 110 includes at least equipment evaluation means 211, water quality evaluation means 212, and primary evaluation means 213, progress confirmation means 221, and first management abnormality detection means 222. Further, it is possible to further include a follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223, a guidance-required evaluation means 224, and a second management abnormality detection means 225. The apparatus 1 can further include means for counting the secondary evaluation and means for notifying the user of the apparatus 1 of the secondary evaluation by e-mail or the like. Each of these means is realized when the central processing unit 111 provided in the computer 110 executes the program P.

  The flow of primary evaluation, which is a series of processes for determining primary determination based on facility actual data and water quality test result data input to the apparatus 1, will be described with reference to FIG. The apparatus 1 can start a primary evaluation when, for example, new facility actual data is input to the apparatus 1 and when new water quality test result data is input to the apparatus 1. Each step of the primary evaluation is executed by a primary evaluation unit configured by the facility evaluation unit 211, the water quality evaluation unit 212, and the primary evaluation unit 213.

  When the primary evaluation is started, the equipment evaluation means 211 reads the equipment standards and the equipment actual data from the storage means 120 in Step 1, and compares the equipment actual data with the equipment standards in Step 2 to compare the equipment actual data. Determines whether the equipment meets equipment standards. More specifically, in step 2, if there is a value of the corresponding equipment actual data item for each equipment standard item, it is determined that the equipment actual data conforms to the equipment standard regardless of the content. . The equipment evaluation unit 211 outputs equipment normal information when it is determined that the equipment actual data conforms to the equipment standards, and outputs equipment abnormality information when it is determined that the equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment standards. The apparatus 1 temporarily stores equipment normal information or equipment abnormality information output from the equipment evaluation means 211 as equipment evaluation information.

  Further, the water quality evaluation unit 212 reads the water quality standard and the water quality test result data from the storage unit 120 in step 3, and in step 4 compares the water quality test result data with the water quality standard, and the water quality test result data becomes the water quality standard. Determine if it fits. More specifically, step 4 compares each item of the water quality test result data with the conditions set in the corresponding item of the water quality standard, and if all items are met, the water quality test result data is If any item does not conform, the water quality test result data shall conform to the water quality standards. The water quality evaluation unit 212 outputs water quality normal information when the water quality test result data conforms to the water quality standard, and outputs water quality abnormality information when the water quality test result data does not meet the water quality standard. In FIG. 12, it is shown that the process in the water quality evaluation unit 212 is performed after the process in the facility evaluation unit 211, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the water quality evaluation is performed before the process in the facility evaluation unit 211. The processing by the means 212 may be performed, or the equipment evaluation means 211 and the water quality evaluation means 212 may perform the processing in parallel. The apparatus 1 temporarily stores the water quality normality information or the water quality abnormality information output from the water quality evaluation unit 212 as water quality evaluation information.

  Next, in step 5, the primary evaluation means 213 acquires the equipment evaluation information and the water quality evaluation information temporarily stored in the device 1, and determines and outputs a primary determination based on the combination. Specifically, when the acquired information is a combination of equipment normal information and water quality normal information, a normal judgment is output, and when the acquired information is a combination of equipment abnormal information and water quality normal information, an equipment abnormality judgment is output. If the acquired information is a combination of equipment normal information and water quality abnormality information, a water quality abnormality judgment is output.If the acquired information is a combination of equipment abnormality information and water quality abnormality information, an audit judgment is output. Output. The apparatus 1 stores the primary determination output from the primary evaluation unit 213, and the primary evaluation ends.

  Next, the flow of the secondary evaluation, which is a series of processes for determining the secondary determination using the primary determination determined by the primary evaluation, will be described with reference to FIGS. Each step of the secondary determination is composed of a progress confirmation means 221, a first management abnormality detection means 222, a follow-up observation / cause investigation means 223, a guidance evaluation means 224, and a second management abnormality detection means 225. It is executed by the next evaluation unit. The device 1 selects a means for starting the secondary determination from these means depending on the type of the primary determination. The relationship between the primary determination and the means for starting the secondary evaluation is as shown in FIG.

  When the primary evaluation is normal determination, the apparatus 1 starts secondary evaluation from the progress confirmation unit 221. The flow of processing in the progress confirmation unit 221 is shown in FIG. In order for the progress checking means 221 to function effectively, the facility actual data input to the apparatus 1 is determined so as to include water quality data inspected during the maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank. In addition, the device 1 stores facility actual data input in the past in the storage device 120 as past facility actual data. In step 1, the progress confirmation unit 221 acquires the past facility actual data of the target septic tank within a predetermined period or the predetermined number of times from the storage unit 120, and further acquires a water quality standard. In step 2, each item of past inspection water quality data, which is past water quality data included in each acquired past facility actual condition data, is compared with the conditions set in the corresponding items of the water quality standard, and past inspection water quality data is Determine if it meets water quality standards. More specifically, step 2 determines that the past inspection water quality data conforms to the water quality standard when all items of all acquired past inspection water quality data conform to the water quality standard, and If any item in the inspection water quality data does not conform to the water quality standard, it is determined that the past inspection water quality data does not conform to the water quality standard. The progress confirmation means 221 outputs a determination of no abnormality when the past water quality test result data conforms to the water quality standard, and outputs a past inspection water quality abnormality judgment when the past water quality test result data does not meet the water quality standard. To do.

  When the primary evaluation is equipment abnormality determination, the apparatus 1 starts secondary evaluation from the first management abnormality detection means 222. Moreover, the apparatus 1 also starts the process of the 1st management abnormality detection means 222, when progress confirmation means 221 outputs past inspection water quality abnormality determination. The flow of processing in the first management abnormality detection means 222 is shown in FIG. The first management abnormality detection means 222 acquires the past equipment actual data and the equipment inspection standard from the storage means 120 in Step 1, and in Step 2, checks each item for each of the acquired past equipment actual data. It is determined whether or not the past equipment actual data meets the equipment inspection standard in comparison with the conditions defined in the corresponding item of the standard. More specifically, in step 2, if all items of all past equipment actual data meet the equipment inspection standards, it is determined that the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standards. If any item of the facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard, it is determined that the past facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard. The first management abnormality detection means 222 outputs a follow-up observation / cause pursuit determination when the past facility actual data conforms to the facility inspection standard, and is necessary when the past facility actual data does not conform to the facility inspection standard. Outputs management status check judgment.

  When the primary evaluation is a water quality abnormality determination, the device 1 starts the secondary evaluation from the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223. The flow of processing in the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223 is shown in FIG. In step 1, the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223 acquires the equipment inspection standard and the plurality of equipment actual data, which is the past equipment actual data of the plurality of septic tanks, from the storage means 120. The data created during maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the actual equipment data of the septic tank to be judged is extracted from the inside. It should be noted that extracting and acquiring data that matches a specific condition from a plurality of data in this way can be realized using a known database system. In step 2, for each of the extracted plural equipment actual data, each item is compared with the conditions set in the corresponding item of the equipment inspection standard to determine whether the plural equipment actual data meets the equipment inspection standard. . More specifically, in step 2, if all items of all the extracted multiple facility actual data meet the facility inspection standard, it is determined that the multiple facility actual data conforms to the facility inspection standard, and extracted. If any of the items of the plurality of actual equipment data does not conform to the equipment inspection standard, it is determined that the plurality of actual equipment data does not conform to the equipment inspection standard. The follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223 outputs a follow-up observation / cause pursuit determination when the plural equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standard, and an improvement determination required when the plural equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment inspection standard. Is output.

  When the primary evaluation is an audit determination, the apparatus 1 starts the secondary evaluation from the instruction requiring evaluation means 224. Also, the apparatus 1 starts the processing of the instruction requiring evaluation means 224 even when the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means 223 outputs a determination of improvement required. FIG. 16 shows the flow of processing in the guidance evaluation means 224. In step 1, the guidance evaluation means 224 acquires a plurality of equipment actual data, which is past equipment actual data of the plurality of septic tanks, from the storage means 120, and from that, the same operator as the equipment actual data of the septic tank to be determined Extract what was created at the time of maintenance inspection or cleaning, and obtain auditing standards. In step 2, the extracted plurality of facility actual data is compared with the conditions defined in each item of the audit standard to determine whether the plurality of facility actual data meets the audit standard. More specifically, for example, when the number of applicable items among all items of the audit standard reaches a predetermined ratio, it is determined that the plurality of facility actual data does not conform to the audit standard. The guidance evaluation means 224 outputs an improvement request determination when the plurality of facility actual data conforms to the audit standard, and outputs a guidance required determination when the plurality of facility actual data does not conform to the audit standard.

  The apparatus 1 starts the process of the 2nd management abnormality detection means 225, when the instruction | indication required evaluation means 224 outputs improvement request determination. The second management abnormality detection unit 225 is the same as the first management abnormality detection unit 222 described with reference to FIG. 14 except for the conditions under which the process is started.

1: Septic tank maintenance management state abnormality detection device 110: Computer 111: Central processing unit 112: RAM
113: ROM
114: hard disk drive 115: input / output interface 116: communication interface 117: bus 120: storage means 211: facility evaluation means 212: water quality evaluation means 213: primary evaluation means 221: progress check means 222: first management abnormality detection means 223 : Follow-up / cause pursuit means 224: instruction evaluation means 225: second management abnormality detection means

Claims (6)

A septic tank maintenance management status abnormality detection device for detecting septic tank installation and maintenance abnormality,
A computer,
Equipment standards connected to the computer and set for the installation and maintenance of the septic tank, and data on the actual situation of the installation and maintenance of the septic tank, and the actual equipment data created during maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank, Storage means for storing water quality standards to be satisfied by the treated water discharged from the inside of the septic tank and water quality inspection result data obtained by inspecting the quality of the treated water discharged from the inside of the septic tank,
With
The computer
The equipment standard and the equipment actual data are read from the storage means, the equipment standard and the equipment actual data are compared to determine whether the equipment actual data conforms to the equipment standards, and the equipment actual data Output equipment normal information when it conforms to the equipment standards, and outputs equipment abnormality information when the equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment standards, equipment evaluation means,
Reading the water quality standard and the water quality test result data from the storage means, comparing the water quality standard and the water quality test result data to determine whether the water quality test result data meets the water quality standard, Water quality evaluation means for outputting water quality normal information when the water quality test result data conforms to the water quality standard, and for outputting water quality abnormality information when the water quality test result data does not conform to the water quality standard;
The equipment normal information or the equipment abnormality information generated by the equipment evaluation means and the water quality normal information or the water quality abnormality information generated by the water quality evaluation means are acquired, and the acquired information is the equipment normal information. In the case of a combination with the water quality normal information, a normal judgment is output, and in a case where the acquired information is a combination of the equipment abnormality information and the water quality normal information, an equipment abnormality judgment is output, and the acquired information is the equipment. Primary evaluation means that outputs a water quality abnormality determination in the case of a combination of normal information and the water quality abnormality information, and outputs an audit determination if the acquired information is a combination of the equipment abnormality information and the water quality abnormality information. When,
Only including,
The storage means includes a plurality of equipment actual data that is past equipment actual data of a plurality of septic tanks, and an equipment inspection standard that is a standard for the equipment actual data set to detect problems in maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tanks. Store further,
The computer
When obtaining the water quality abnormality determination output from the primary evaluation means,
Obtaining the plurality of facility actual data and the facility inspection standard from the storage means;
From the plurality of equipment actual data, extract what was created during the maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the equipment actual data of the septic tank,
Compare the extracted multiple equipment actual data and the equipment inspection standard, determine whether the extracted multiple equipment actual data meets the equipment inspection standard,
If the extracted multiple equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standards, the follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is output,
If the extracted multiple equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment inspection standards, an improvement determination is output.
In addition, follow-up and cause search
apparatus. The storage means further stores an audit standard that is a standard for facility actual data set to detect improper maintenance or cleaning of the septic tank,
The computer
When obtaining the audit judgment output from the primary evaluation means , or when obtaining the necessary improvement judgment output from the follow-up observation / cause pursuit means,
Obtaining the plurality of facility actual data and the audit standard from the storage means,
From the plurality of equipment actual data, extract what was created during the maintenance inspection or cleaning by the same company as the equipment actual data of the septic tank,
Compare the extracted multiple facility actual data and the audit standard, determine whether the extracted multiple facility actual data meets the audit standard,
If the extracted multiple equipment actual data conforms to the audit criteria, an improvement request determination is output,
If the extracted plurality of facility actual data does not conform to the audit standard, a guidance instruction determination is output.
Further comprising a main teaching evaluation means, according to claim 1. The storage means further stores past facility actual data that is past facility actual data of the septic tank,
The computer
When obtaining the improvement request determination output from the guidance evaluation means,
Obtaining the past facility actual data and the facility inspection standard from the storage means,
Comparing the past equipment actual data and the equipment inspection standard to determine whether the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standard;
If the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standards, the follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is output,
If the past equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment inspection standards, a management status confirmation judgment is output.
The apparatus according to claim 2 , further comprising second management abnormality detection means. The storage means further stores past facility actual data, which is past facility actual data of the septic tank, and the past facility actual data is past water quality data inspected at the time of maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank. Including inspection water quality data,
The computer
When obtaining a normal judgment output from the primary evaluation means,
Obtaining the past inspection water quality data included in the past facility actual data from the storage means;
Comparing the past inspection water quality data with the water quality standard to determine whether the past inspection water quality data meets the water quality standard;
When the past inspection water quality data conforms to the water quality standard, a determination is made that there is no abnormality,
If the past inspection water quality data does not conform to the water quality standard, a past inspection water quality abnormality determination is output,
The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a progress confirmation unit. The storage means further stores equipment inspection standards, which are standards for equipment actual data set to detect problems in maintenance inspection or cleaning of the septic tank,
The computer
When acquiring equipment abnormality determination output from the primary evaluation means, or when acquiring past inspection water quality abnormality determination output from the progress confirmation means,
Obtaining the past facility actual data and the facility inspection standard from the storage means,
Comparing the past equipment actual data and the equipment inspection standard to determine whether the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standard;
If the past equipment actual data conforms to the equipment inspection standards, the follow-up observation / cause pursuit judgment is output,
If the past equipment actual data does not conform to the equipment inspection standards, a management status confirmation judgment is output.
The apparatus according to claim 4 , further comprising first management abnormality detection means. A program including program code for causing the electronic computer to function as the computer included in the apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5 when executed by the electronic computer.

Images